Er....someone...anyone ?

Carrie Ann Carrie Ann
Quote:
Originally posted by Betty Rocket
My secondary issue (the original issue being the lack of communication) is that I was NOT given the opportunity to correct the review, nor was I told what in the review did not jive with their tastes. Not too cool.
Betty,

Perhaps if the toy was that incompatible with you - as you mentioned in a previous post - the powers that be simply decided revising the review wasn't the best idea. The description review program guidelines do say that if a toy is totally "bad" for someone they'll send it to someone else. And it's not very logical to try to have you fix a review if the toy was completely wrong for you.

Regardless of they why of it all we have to remember that management around here has been busy as hell - as can be clearly seen by looking at the site and the improvements they've made in our contributor guidelines. Victoria has also been dealing with her interview on top of all her normal duties. On top of that there are more and more people doing the description reviews. The ten days since your email to EF really isn't that long when you consider all those things.

Believe me, I know how it feels when you're aggravated and disappointed about something. But I was told quite clearly by my fellow reviewers when I was in a spot similar to yours that the forum is NOT the place for this sort of stuff. And it's really not. Bringing upset to the forum just upsets a whole bunch of people - which is not good for the community as a whole.

I hope you get things resolved and find yourself in a happy place with EF again. I've found out first hand that it comes much faster if you communicate directly with those in charge rather than airing it all in public.

The public discussion may get you a faster response but keeping it in private definitely gets you more respect and a better resolution.
02/06/2009
Betty Rocket Betty Rocket
Quote:
Originally posted by Carrie Ann
Betty,

Perhaps if the toy was that incompatible with you - as you mentioned in a previous post - the powers that be simply decided revising the review wasn't the best idea. The description review program guidelines do say that if a toy is ... More
As I said in my initial post, I DID attempt to resolve this in private. I do not think this is a cause for "respect" on my behalf, but "respect" for those who are supposed to support the reviewers here. I have been here a long time, and have never seen things handled so shabbily. Who am I seeking respect from? You? Other reviewers? Management?

I find your tone a bit insulting and condescending. I am not a child that needs to be told how I should behave. Nor do I need to hear a sob story about management. I did not bring this to the forum to cause upset, I brought it to get an answer to my question. Victoria was given every opportunity to address this privately, and did not come through. What is insulting about your tone, is that you speak as if you have extensive experience here in dealing with situations like this, and you do not. There have been three persons in Victoria's position since I joined EF, and never has this kind of thing been an issue. Not to mention I BATTLED for an off site forum for situations like this, and was vehemently refused.

You are not in a position to see and know the things I do, so please do not tell me how I should have or could have handled this, this was not the intention of the OP.

If this situation brings upset, so be it. I really don't see it myself. The only person getting defensive and upset is you. It is clear you battle on the side of the powers that be, whatever you motivation is.
02/06/2009
Carrie Ann Carrie Ann
Quote:
Originally posted by Betty Rocket
As I said in my initial post, I DID attempt to resolve this in private. I do not think this is a cause for "respect" on my behalf, but "respect" for those who are supposed to support the reviewers here. I have been here a long time, and have never ... More
Betty? I've been here as long as you have. Not that that means anything but, yanno, I already know about the management changes and whatnot.

I'm sorry you don't like my tone. I'll remind you, however, that you really don't know what my tone is only what you perceive it to be.

As for the rest...
I've recently had quite a few issues with EF. Every time I talked about them on the forum I was told - by my fellow reviewers - that this wasn't the place, that I should email management and remember EF isn't a sex toy soup kitchen and I'm lucky to get toys in the first place.

If that advice was good for me (and no one stood up and said it was bad advice or people shouldn't talk to me in that tone) then it's good for everyone.


As for me being defensive? I'm not. At all. Nor am I upset. Sorry you're perceiving things in that way.
02/06/2009
Miss KissThis Miss KissThis
Quote:
Originally posted by Miss Cinnamon
I third Miss Kiss This's idea (don't get on me about apostrophes--it's late!). Maybe the whole concept of a description "review" is throwing us off.

The more I think about it, the more sense it makes. After all, a description review is just an ... More
My thoughts exactly!
02/06/2009
Betty Rocket Betty Rocket
Quote:
Originally posted by Carrie Ann
Betty? I've been here as long as you have. Not that that means anything but, yanno, I already know about the management changes and whatnot.

I'm sorry you don't like my tone. I'll remind you, however, that you really don't know what my ... More
Thank you for that lovely insight.

I heavily apologize if you think someone passed the position of "REVIEWER REGULATOR" on to you. It's quite a responsibility.

You keep forgetting the original post, that I keep referencing to, that says I DID EMAIL THEM.

A very smart person once told me that although I should be thankful for the gifts EF has bestowed upon me, I should not compromise my integrity and always consider the source.

I am fully aware you covet here in anticipation of my response, so I will post this directly.
02/06/2009
Carrie Ann Carrie Ann
Quote:
Originally posted by Betty Rocket
Thank you for that lovely insight.

I heavily apologize if you think someone passed the position of "REVIEWER REGULATOR" on to you. It's quite a responsibility.

You keep forgetting the original post, that I keep referencing to, that ... More
And I'm defensive?

C'mon, Betty. You brought drama to the forum after not getting a response to an email. You got a response from Victoria and still continue to foster the drama by offering up private emails for public consumption and reiterating your complaints - even after having been offered explanations.

I don't at all feel it's my responsibility to regulate the reviewers. But I do have the right to offer up my opinion since you're the one who made it a public issue and I do be the public.

How about we all grab a bottle of Mad Dog and a vibrator and have a little fun instead of having drama?
02/06/2009
Betty Rocket Betty Rocket
Quote:
Originally posted by Carrie Ann
And I'm defensive?

C'mon, Betty. You brought drama to the forum after not getting a response to an email. You got a response from Victoria and still continue to foster the drama by offering up private emails for public consumption and ... More
Hardy har

No one brought drama here, well almost no one....

May i refer you back to my original post, again.

The direction this thread took was the result of something, or someone else.

I offered up emails in private to rebut some of the things Victoria said that were untrue. It's my right to defend myself, however I chose not to do that publicly and save Victoria the embarassment. My reasons for doing that REALLY do not need an explanation.....really .
02/06/2009
Epiphora Epiphora
Quote:
Originally posted by Carrie Ann
And I'm defensive?

C'mon, Betty. You brought drama to the forum after not getting a response to an email. You got a response from Victoria and still continue to foster the drama by offering up private emails for public consumption and ... More
Private emails? I saw Victoria's email, and it ASKED if Betty wanted her to post it in the forums.

I just don't understand why Betty wasn't allowed to post about this. 10 days is a long time to wait for an email response. Since I have never had a review "declined," I would have probably done the wrong thing. She did not start this for drama, but as a last resort, so stop making it sound like that.
02/06/2009
Epiphora Epiphora
the same* thing, sorry.
02/06/2009
Mr Guy Mr Guy
Okay, that’ll do. This is where the lighting guy steps into Christian Bale’s shot and brings to an unceremonious close to a scene that was overwrought at best. Once again – and I find myself having to say this an awful lot more than I care to – drama went out with ‘you go, girl’ and Hootie & the Blowfish. It’s old. It’s crusty. It’s stale.

Now let’s all of us put on our big-girl panties, be ye gals or guys (over-tight though mine may be) and play nice.

If you have an issue with EF, take it up with the appropriate person(s), privately, through the appropriate channels. If you have an issue with a member, address it privately.

And that is a wrap.
02/06/2009
Betty Rocket Betty Rocket
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Guy
Okay, that’ll do. This is where the lighting guy steps into Christian Bale’s shot and brings to an unceremonious close to a scene that was overwrought at best. Once again – and I find myself having to say this an awful lot more than I care to – drama ... More
Not so much...........

It would be simple to dismiss things with the wave of a magic wand in the hopes that things would just go back to the ways things were.

I am concerned about many things here, more than what I was originally concerned about (let me direct folks to the OP....again)

First, for the final time, every attempt was made to get an answer to my question through the appropriate channels....my attempts were either ignored or treated as unimportant. Whichever the case is, I did my part, but I was unsucessful.

Second, (i hate to do this, but I am left with no choice, silence is not golden) I was told in an email that this thread would be deleted, because someone was afraid of getting in trouble. Again, we are faced with an individual that would rather censor our opinions and thoughts than deal with the original issue at hand. Completely counter-productive and a little shady. For an organization who had no problem dismissing the fact that they released my real name, address, and phone number to the general public, they sure seem concerned about being thrown under the bus. Sorry, I have no sympathy for someone who did not do their job getting called on their irresponsibility. If I don't do MY job well, people could get hurt. Lucky that is not the case here, there would be many casualties.

Third, I am going away for the weekend, so I intend to drink a lot, fuck a lot, and further explore my options in regard to EF. I am not saying this to induce a barrage of "please don't go" emails, but simply to indicate that perhaps I have grown weary of this joint. My usefulness now is questionable to me, and there are other fish in the sea....who value their reviewers.

Have a nice weekend all
02/06/2009
Victoria Victoria
Instead of responding to vague accusations, I will let you all decide for yourself:

LINK TO REVIEW IN QUESTION: link

We only published this review so that it could be seen and read by everyone.

LINK TO DESCRIPTION REVIEW PROGRAM GUIDELINES: link

Please read through them thoroughly and decide for yourself if you think the review is within the guidelines.

Thanks!
02/06/2009
Dragon Dragon
Quote:
Originally posted by Backseat Boohoo
I don't mean to be a snot, but you always write her name as "Ephidora," and her handle is actually "Epiphora." It's a term you hear a lot in English language courses.
Ah fuck... Here we go again.

First. Epiphora - I completely apologize for now and ever mispelling your name. For the record - I was on Eden last night while cooking dinner, dealing with a child with a fever, and after telling my boss that I simply was not going to participate in a fundamental aspect of the school. I didn't scroll up to the top of the page to correctly remember her name. I did my best, and now that I'm aware of making a mistake - I'll try to do better.

Betty - before you leave think about what you benefits you can find from the relationships, and the information and the products that Eden has to offer. Then look around at all the rest of the online sites.

All of the staff of Eden - It's pretty clear that you are fighting the same issues again and again. You are dealing with drama on the forum and telling the reviewers to "grow up." This is a problem that you clearly haven't addressed sufficiently. There are communication issues that keep coming up. There is an undercurrent of mistrust and possibly more negative adjectives.

I looked at that review, and I'm familiar with the guidelines. I like Betty a lot, but I will agree that in my mind that is not an objective review. I'm personally a bit fond of a little rough treatment or hard toys. However, Eden is equally at fault here. Unless I'm miss understanding something - they sent the review back under 1. DECLINED not PLEASE REVISE, not objective, and 2. There was no response to requests for explanation.

Perhaps there needs to be more staff handing email?
02/06/2009
Backseat Boohoo Backseat Boohoo
Quote:
Originally posted by Dragon
Ah fuck... Here we go again.

First. Epiphora - I completely apologize for now and ever mispelling your name. For the record - I was on Eden last night while cooking dinner, dealing with a child with a fever, and after telling my boss that I ... More
I know you weren't doing it on purpose; it's just that I'm an English major and it made me twitch a bit. Sorry about that.
02/06/2009
Betty Rocket Betty Rocket
I wanted to publicly thank everyone who ranked my review NOT USEFUL AT ALL. It speaks volumes about what I had originally thought about this place.

Appreciate it! Really!
02/07/2009
Red Red
This isn't my dog, but I just wanted to say that I really respect the folks at EF for putting a forum on this site - internet forums *always* have angry threads and complainy threads, so no surprise this one does as well. Giving the community a means to say whatever it wishes is a bold move, and I respect that.
02/07/2009
Airlia Airlia
Quote:
Originally posted by Betty Rocket
I wanted to publicly thank everyone who ranked my review NOT USEFUL AT ALL. It speaks volumes about what I had originally thought about this place.

Appreciate it! Really!
I've read through the whole thread and it all sounds messy and horrible. I know you said you were given your answer as soon as this thread went up - were you given the option of correcting your review?

The ratings are well... juvenile, and I hope that you aren't too disheartened by them.
02/07/2009
Carrie Ann Carrie Ann
Personally, I rated it somewhat useful. It had all the basic info but it wasn't at all objective. I think it would have been a good regular review, not so much as a product description review.

It also makes sense, to me, that it would not be posted. The guidelines ask that you not rate a toy at all if it wasn't compatible with your body and that seems to be the main issue here. The review can't be very useful if the toy couldn't be used properly. Rather than rate things low based on anatomical issues and personal preference it makes sense to not rate them at all and have someone who won't have those problems do the description.

*shrug*

That's just me, though. This whole issue is pretty whack and filled with "he said, she said" crap and cliquishness.

The only good thing to come out of it is if it can be used as a learning tool for other PD Reviewers.
02/07/2009
Baby Sinead Baby Sinead
All this drama over a declined review seems absolutely silly. The review isn't very good but you shouldn't take criticism so harshly especially if you're gonna be writing things that are rated!
04/01/2009
Baby Sinead Baby Sinead
All this drama over a declined review seems absolutely silly. The review isn't very good but you shouldn't take criticism so harshly especially if you're gonna be writing things that are rated!
04/01/2009
Backseat Boohoo Backseat Boohoo
Quote:
Originally posted by Baby Sinead
All this drama over a declined review seems absolutely silly. The review isn't very good but you shouldn't take criticism so harshly especially if you're gonna be writing things that are rated!
Betty Rocket has left the building. This matter is closed and over.
04/02/2009
Mamastoys Mamastoys
Quote:
Originally posted by Epiphora
All of us in the descriptions program know that we're supposed to be objective. We understand those reviews are different. The problem is, how does one become objective about what is, essentially, a personal and physical experience? if I try a toy ... More
It is so hard to write a review sometimes and not include the objectivity.. I agree 110% it is good in theory but hard in practice...
04/02/2009
  • 1
  • 2
Total posts: 52
Unique posters: 20