Okay so relax, I'm not going to be the millionth person to ask how our user rank is determined. I've familiarized myself with the contributor rank rubric, but I'm still a little confused. I feel like I've been doing everything I should be but my rank has been static for quite some time.
A whopping 62% of my ranking is determined by writing reviews and average usefulness of those reviews. I have written two reviews in the past week that have gotten (so far) good ratings and still I remain at 5.8 in my rank. I understand that my rank is relative to how active other members other, but shouldn't I be going up at least .1 sooner or later? It seems strange to me.
If anyone can offer any help, I'd appreciate it
A whopping 62% of my ranking is determined by writing reviews and average usefulness of those reviews. I have written two reviews in the past week that have gotten (so far) good ratings and still I remain at 5.8 in my rank. I understand that my rank is relative to how active other members other, but shouldn't I be going up at least .1 sooner or later? It seems strange to me.
If anyone can offer any help, I'd appreciate it