So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body and the backs of her legs?
Excuse me, Ma'am, but are your legs on backwards?
Quote:
Yeah, those legs are certainly on backwards.
Originally posted by
AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body
...
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body and the backs of her legs?
10/01/2011
Quote:
I agree. It probably is her backside, but the flat rear and dimple make it look like it would be her front. It looks weird.
Originally posted by
Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
10/01/2011
Quote:
This. The legs are on right, but they look weird when she has no ass and a prominent dimple in her back.
Originally posted by
Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
10/01/2011
I think it could be her butt. As someone mentioned, there are many people with really defined back dimples etc that could be mistaken in photo for a navel, and plenty of people have flat bums like that. I've certainly seen plenty of people with backs that are that defined, and who look like that bending over (assless, weight ass to hip to back ratio and definition) all without photoshop.
However, these companies just love excessively photoshopping already sufficiently skinny and cellulite free people until there isn't a blemish to be seen and their calves are the size of my arm. It IS possible they flipped her ass and tried to turn in navel into a back dimple etc.
Also, the top line of the underwear seems a little unusual, and it could be that the picture that they used with the underwear down was of the model bending over at the waist. They may have then removed her original upper body from the shot and meshed it with one of her standing upright.
However, these companies just love excessively photoshopping already sufficiently skinny and cellulite free people until there isn't a blemish to be seen and their calves are the size of my arm. It IS possible they flipped her ass and tried to turn in navel into a back dimple etc.
Also, the top line of the underwear seems a little unusual, and it could be that the picture that they used with the underwear down was of the model bending over at the waist. They may have then removed her original upper body from the shot and meshed it with one of her standing upright.
11/27/2011
Quote:
I thought her legs looked strange when I was wishlisting this item a while back! Lol
Originally posted by
AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body
...
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body and the backs of her legs?
Jan 24, 2:55 am
Quote:
Yeah, pretty much. It looks funny at first glance, but when you enlarge the image you can see that the legs are on right.
Originally posted by
Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
Mar 2, 9:56 pm
Quote:
lol that is trippy.
Originally posted by
AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body
...
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body and the backs of her legs?
Mar 3, 3:10 am
- 1
Total posts:
33
Unique posters: 31
Unique posters: 31