Excuse me, Ma'am, but are your legs on backwards?

AndroAngel AndroAngel
Opaque thigh highs with satin lace up back
Related to: 
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's body and the backs of her legs?
10/01/2011
  • Better Price Sale - Save 50%
  • Better Price Sale - Save 70%
  • Better Price Sale - Save 60%
  • Better Price - Save 40%
  • Try a luxury harness with a dildo and save 45% on a kit!
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All promotions
Eucaly Eucaly
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... More
Yeah, those legs are certainly on backwards.
10/01/2011
js250 js250
Sorry, she just has no butt. That is her ass and back of her legs.
10/01/2011
Jimbo Jones Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
10/01/2011
Jul!a Jul!a
I'm definitely seeing backside, but I can see how it looks like her legs are on backwards.
10/01/2011
Yaoi Pervette (deleted) Yaoi Pervette (deleted)
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
I agree. It probably is her backside, but the flat rear and dimple make it look like it would be her front. It looks weird.
10/01/2011
AndroAngel AndroAngel
What threw me is that above her panties, it looks like her hip-bones are visible.
10/01/2011
MaryExy MaryExy
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
This. The legs are on right, but they look weird when she has no ass and a prominent dimple in her back.
10/01/2011
AngelvMaynard AngelvMaynard
Hahaha! Thats funny. I think she is just tilting her pelvis in a funny way, but they do look backward at first glance.
10/01/2011
Paladin Fantasys Paladin Fantasys
Yep, looks like a belly button in the small of the back!
10/01/2011
arewehavingfun? arewehavingfun?
Good catch--you do have to look closely. What gives it away for me, is the high cut of the panties.!!!
10/04/2011
jessi2 jessi2
it is probably just a poor job in photo shop! It may also be a weird looking mannequin
10/26/2011
l'amour l'amour
That made me laugh too hard! I had to take a second look!
10/27/2011
T E S K I ℉ T E S K I ℉
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.

that's exactly what it is
10/30/2011
NavyDoll87 NavyDoll87
I feel like I'm staring at an optical illusion.
10/30/2011
geliebt geliebt
Quote:
Originally posted by jessi2
it is probably just a poor job in photo shop! It may also be a weird looking mannequin
I'm certain it's seriously bad photoshop. Hilariously bad!
11/27/2011
Cherrylane Cherrylane
I think it could be her butt. As someone mentioned, there are many people with really defined back dimples etc that could be mistaken in photo for a navel, and plenty of people have flat bums like that. I've certainly seen plenty of people with backs that are that defined, and who look like that bending over (assless, weight ass to hip to back ratio and definition) all without photoshop.

However, these companies just love excessively photoshopping already sufficiently skinny and cellulite free people until there isn't a blemish to be seen and their calves are the size of my arm. It IS possible they flipped her ass and tried to turn in navel into a back dimple etc.

Also, the top line of the underwear seems a little unusual, and it could be that the picture that they used with the underwear down was of the model bending over at the waist. They may have then removed her original upper body from the shot and meshed it with one of her standing upright.
11/27/2011
wetone123 wetone123
When I was younger and very thin, people teased me and called me "No Butt"! I believe that's the case here. This model just has no butt to her! I'm glad I have a nice curvy butt now! Butt yes, it does look quite unusual for a model to have no butt at all.
11/27/2011
PassionateLover2 PassionateLover2
All these answers look plausible, but I think the 'guy' at the computer didn't know how to use the PhotoShop Pro 3 program very well as others have mentioned!!
11/27/2011
geliebt geliebt
Quote:
Originally posted by PassionateLover2
All these answers look plausible, but I think the 'guy' at the computer didn't know how to use the PhotoShop Pro 3 program very well as others have mentioned!!
It's the thighs that give it away. They just look like paper cutouts!
11/28/2011
Princess-Kayla ♥ Princess-Kayla ♥
That kind of freaked me out at first. Lol.
12/04/2011
LAndJ LAndJ
Haha, woah! Awkward.
12/05/2011
sweetiejo sweetiejo
I'm not sure to be honest i think it could either way with these ones.
12/18/2011
GONE! GONE!
Oh dear. That just looks odd and I can't tell what is going on. O.o
12/18/2011
kendra30752 kendra30752
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... More
I thought her legs looked strange when I was wishlisting this item a while back! Lol
01/24/2012
Gleen39 Gleen39
really bad photoshop.... really bad
03/02/2012
Rin (aka Nire) Rin (aka Nire)
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
Yeah, pretty much. It looks funny at first glance, but when you enlarge the image you can see that the legs are on right.
03/02/2012
MamaDivine MamaDivine
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... More
lol that is trippy.
03/03/2012
Positwist Positwist
Haha! Good catch, Andro. Definitely a case of photoshopping wonk.
03/04/2012
Lady Bear Lady Bear
I kinda thought the same thing at first. It does almost look like the front of her torso, but I think it is her back just weird lighting and no butt.
03/12/2012
  • 1
  • 2
Total posts: 46
Unique posters: 43