Quote:
I always identified strongly as a lesbian. I was never really attracted to men. I've always made a point of being active in the queer community. I'm still with the same girl I fell in love with 8 years ago. Or I would be, if she were a girl. As it is, my partner is genderqueer, and I fully enjoy it. Does the fact that I'm engaged to someone who presents as male mean I'm not entitled to the identity I've cultivated for years? I understand what you are saying here, but I'd like to make a point that I'm a lesbian who never changed my mind and yet still don't fit your criteria. There are shades of gray, so please don't blame our collective lack of rights on those of us who do things a bit differently.
Originally posted by
Lif3sambiguity
If you are going to declare yourself as a lesbian then be a lesbian don't have sex with men. If you are a gay guy, have sex with guys. If you are bi, then do whatever you want. If your pan, which I have never heard of, you can fall in love with
...
If you are going to declare yourself as a lesbian then be a lesbian don't have sex with men. If you are a gay guy, have sex with guys. If you are bi, then do whatever you want. If your pan, which I have never heard of, you can fall in love with anything or anyone right? sounds a little fishy to me. Why are there "sexual orientations " if individuals are just going to go off and do what makes them happy or better yet meet their sexual needs at a certain point in time? What happened to traditional standards in relationships? What happened to being gay and being happy, being a lesbian and loving only pussy? No wonder we can't get equal rights or unions, because we "change" our minds and wants and don't stick to any one specific thing. I am not hating on anyone, I am just saying we make things more complicated then what they actually are.



















