Hypothetical... Would you continue to have relations with...

CaseyDeuce CaseyDeuce
If you had relations, casual or more, with someone and found out that more than 5 years ago, they were convicted of possessing inappropriate sexual materials, would you still be able to or want to have relations with that person?
Answers (private voting - your screen name will NOT appear in the results):
Yes, the past is the past.
1
No.
16
Maybe?
38
Other, please explain if you're comfortable to.
4
Total votes: 59 (59 voters)
Poll is closed
01/24/2013
  • Luxury To People: Save 20% on Select Designer Brands
  • Better Price Sale - Save 60%
  • Better Price Sale - Save 70%
  • Free Attachments with Fairy Mini. Save $21.99

    • FREE attachments
      Free attachments
    • Fairy Mini
    Get a Free 3 attachment set

    Expires on Oct 28, 2015 at 5pm ET Terms

  • Better Price Sale - Save 50%
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All promotions
Mr. E Mr. E
It would have to be some bad stuff to be "convicted".
01/24/2013
Incendiaire Incendiaire
It depends on the circumstances, because some of the laws can be really stupid. In the UK recently a man was prosecuted under obscenity laws for possessing photographs of himself and his friends using urethral toys, and practising fisting. Luckily common sense prevailed and the jury acquitted.
01/24/2013
KinkyNicki92 KinkyNicki92
depends on what it was and how bad it was for him to be convicted
01/24/2013
BrittaniMaree BrittaniMaree
maybe....
01/24/2013
Bleu Bleu
It depends. If it's something like involving minors and he was convicted and had all this terrible evidence against him, then yes. I would totally break it off and leave.

If it's of himself and the laws that got him charged were pretty stupid then I would stay with him.
01/24/2013
Munko Munko
Where I live it's pretty difficult to get convicted of something of this matter if it's not really bad. I had to go with no, simply because here it generally pertains to children and I am in a position where it's my responsibility to keep kids safe, so absolutely not!
01/24/2013
Bubaloo Bubaloo
It would depend on what those "inappropriate sexual materials" were.
01/24/2013
Forum Moderator Forum Moderator
It would be much appreciated if responses did not include the phrase "child [p-word]"...phrase it any other way you would like but please refrain from putting those two words side by side. Thank you.
01/24/2013
PropertyOfPotter PropertyOfPotter
If children were involved in it, I would leave the very second I found out!!! Anything else, would depend on the material.
01/24/2013
Bleu Bleu
Quote:
Originally posted by Forum Moderator
It would be much appreciated if responses did not include the phrase "child [p-word]"...phrase it any other way you would like but please refrain from putting those two words side by side. Thank you.
Sorry. I didn't know. Wont happen again!
01/24/2013
Beautiful-Disaster Beautiful-Disaster
definitely not.
01/24/2013
KissTheSkyBaby KissTheSkyBaby
It would definitely depend on the material.
01/24/2013
Pururin Pururin
It really depends on the situation. If children were involved though, then probably not.
01/24/2013
PeaceToTheMiddleEast PeaceToTheMiddleEast
It would depend on what it was. I would draw the line if children were involved though.
01/24/2013
kendra30752 kendra30752
Quote:
Originally posted by CaseyDeuce
If you had relations, casual or more, with someone and found out that more than 5 years ago, they were convicted of possessing inappropriate sexual materials, would you still be able to or want to have relations with that person?
Hmm.. "inappropriate sexual materials..." the only "materials" I can figure that means is something to do with pornography, likely minor? If I'm wrong, correct me, but I will answer your question (if this is what it means) honestly -- yes, if I found out that someone I'd once had any kind of relations with was convicted of possessing any kind of illegal material that has to do with pornography (especially minor) my feelings would completely change about them and no, I would never be able to find any attraction to them after learning that information.

Any other type of thing probably wouldn't bother me, but the reason I'd react so strongly to it being that type of "illegal material" is kind of biased because I personally was a minor when I was raped & pornography also was included during my "attack." So you can see why I would feel so intensely about this.

However, that's about the only type of thing that really could change my feelings for someone.
01/24/2013
doowop doowop
I wouldn't be able to do it. If children or a real rape scene were involved, heck no.
01/24/2013
CaseyDeuce CaseyDeuce
Lets say it was materials sent via text from someone under the age of 16. (Still hypothetical.)

Personally, I know what kind of a kid I was, and if I had a camera-phone at the age of 15, I'm sure I would have been one of those kids who sent inappropriate things to people who probably shouldn't have had them.

So who is is the wrong? The kid? The adult?
01/24/2013
asphyxia asphyxia
Like most other people said, it really depends on the nature of the material. If children were involved, and it wasn't something innocuous like two teens sexting, but actual CHILDREN, or something non-consensually violent, then I probably wouldn't even give the person the courtesy of a goodbye. They would be out of my life in a heartbeat and I wouldn't look back.

EDIT: The reason I think those issues are significant, even after five years, is that someone aroused by those sorts of things probably STILL likes them and that is not the type of person I'd want to be around personally OR bring around anyone I care about.
01/24/2013
himynameissteph himynameissteph
Depends what it is?
01/24/2013
RedKyuubi RedKyuubi
Depends what it was
01/24/2013
Ansley Ansley
Quote:
Originally posted by CaseyDeuce
Lets say it was materials sent via text from someone under the age of 16. (Still hypothetical.)

Personally, I know what kind of a kid I was, and if I had a camera-phone at the age of 15, I'm sure I would have been one of those kids who ... More
By the law's definition, it is always the adult's. Why does a sixteen year old have a phone number for someone who can be charged with statutory rape (who isn't directly related to them, that is)?

I, too, was that kind of a teenager.
01/24/2013
rosythorn rosythorn
If they were convicted I would probably not be with them. usually that is pretty bad, not always, but usually.
01/24/2013
Rory Rory
Kiddy porn would be a good reason to stay away. Hypothetically you would have to look at all of the facts. Was the sender 15 sending pictures to an 18 year old? Were they boy friend & girlfriend? Was he much older? Why didn't he delete it knowing she was under age? And many more questions...
01/24/2013
RavenInChains RavenInChains
If it were an underage person and he was an adult, not a stupid teenager playing games, then I would not see him again. I have kids to think about.
01/24/2013
Flower1 Flower1
maybe
01/24/2013
sweetpea12 sweetpea12
Quote:
Originally posted by CaseyDeuce
If you had relations, casual or more, with someone and found out that more than 5 years ago, they were convicted of possessing inappropriate sexual materials, would you still be able to or want to have relations with that person?
No I really wouldn't
01/24/2013
EmuLove EmuLove
depends on the kind of materials
01/24/2013
Missmarc Missmarc
Quote:
Originally posted by CaseyDeuce
If you had relations, casual or more, with someone and found out that more than 5 years ago, they were convicted of possessing inappropriate sexual materials, would you still be able to or want to have relations with that person?
It's a "maybe" for me.
01/24/2013
ViVix ViVix
Quote:
Originally posted by CaseyDeuce
If you had relations, casual or more, with someone and found out that more than 5 years ago, they were convicted of possessing inappropriate sexual materials, would you still be able to or want to have relations with that person?
What kind of sex materials get people convicted? I guess I'm a bit uneducated in that area...even as a Criminal Justice major.
01/24/2013
  • 1
  • 2
Total posts: 45
Unique posters: 40