#Rumble - Weekly Review Rumble 119

The New Intimacy

#Rumble - Weekly Review Rumble 119

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: aliceinthehole aliceinthehole
Quote:
Originally posted by WhoopieDoo
Congrats sktb0007! You did a great job!

Not to complain. I'm very flattered that I have three reviews on here, but doesn't that work to my disadvantage?
i hope you win! your reviews are great. i love how you detail every photo, and each photo is helpful to the review.
02/01/2012
Contributor: Beck Beck
Quote:
Originally posted by lilly555
I'd like to nominate Beck's review I Love You, Iris!
Awe thank you tripod! I had no idea I was nominated!
02/01/2012
Contributor: Silverdrop Silverdrop
Nominating Glamour Nana Not so sensual.
02/01/2012
Contributor: Silverdrop Silverdrop
Quote:
Originally posted by Breas
I don't think I agree with this.. only because then it seems that the nominees aren't being judged on their reviews, but more on their popularity. Let's say someone had three reviews in a rumble. Basing the winner on combined votes ... more
I think I understand what you're saying. It just seems unfair that a person would be competing against themselves. Maybe it should be limited to one review per contributor per Rumble? But I don't know how you'd decide which one would be the one to get voted on.
02/01/2012
Contributor: Ms. N Ms. N
Quote:
Originally posted by Silverdrop
I think I understand what you're saying. It just seems unfair that a person would be competing against themselves. Maybe it should be limited to one review per contributor per Rumble? But I don't know how you'd decide which one would be ... more
I like that idea. I would think either the reviewer should choose, or it should be whatever one was nominated first. Actually, that would probably be the most fair way to do it.
02/01/2012
Contributor: CrystaCat CrystaCat
Good Luck!
02/02/2012
Contributor: lilly555 lilly555
Quote:
Originally posted by Beck
Awe thank you tripod! I had no idea I was nominated!
Sorry, I forgot to mention it I nom'd you after commenting on your review
02/02/2012
Contributor: lilly555 lilly555
I'm also going to nominate Lexical's Water Off A Duck's Back...
02/02/2012
Contributor: Jul!a Jul!a
Quote:
Originally posted by Ms. N
I like that idea. I would think either the reviewer should choose, or it should be whatever one was nominated first. Actually, that would probably be the most fair way to do it.
I have no problems with it being the first review to be nominated.

I don't think it would be all that fair now to have it be tallied up because like previously mentioned, someone with three reviews in there would pretty much automatically win. I can make a voting poll and see what the rest of the community has to say.

(most of that was just a general response, and not directed specifically at you, Ms. N, I just happened to already be responding to you and kept talking, lol.)
02/02/2012
Contributor: Badass Badass
Congrats sktb0007!

good luck to the rest of you
02/02/2012
Contributor: eeep eeep
Quote:
Originally posted by Silverdrop
I think I understand what you're saying. It just seems unfair that a person would be competing against themselves. Maybe it should be limited to one review per contributor per Rumble? But I don't know how you'd decide which one would be ... more
I agree, and I have suggested before - letting the reviewer decide which one they want to have in the rumble seems the fairest way to do it. That way they aren't competing against themselves and it gets based on one review - rather than have the points from multiple reviews attributed to one person.
02/02/2012
Contributor: DreamWolf DreamWolf
Quote:
Originally posted by Curiouscat
Congrats everyone

Nomming DreamWolf's review The No-Throb-No-Vroom Hearts
Thank you dear Curiouscat!!! I can't believe that I have got nominated, I never expected it in my whooooooooooooooole life!!! ~catches breath about to fall out of her skin
02/04/2012