Quote:True, but the problem's the same with the current system, isn't it?
Originally posted by BBW Talks Toys
The problem with the 'one error, two...etc' is that there's still no way to know if it was the editor's doing or if the reviewer changed it back.
Still, reviewers changing things back is probably relatively uncommon. And assuming an editor gets several "slack" less-than-perfect votes (to account for mistake votes, reviewers changing things, etc.), it shouldn't really hurt the editor in the long run if they do a good job in general.
I think a message to editors when they get less-than-excellent votes so they can go back and double-check would be a good idea, too.