I was just browsing reviewers who joined recently, and I noticed something curious. Two reviewers can have just one review written, and have similar usefulness rankings on their reviews, but have vastly different personal ranks. For example, one reviewer's review was ranked "somewhat useful" and she has a 3.9 ranking. Another reviewer's review was ranked "useful" but he has a ZERO ranking.
What accounts for this drastic difference?
What accounts for this drastic difference?