Quote:
It is interesting but seems a little too much for people to do. Like the other's state how can we assure people wont vote for themselves? Will not some people have the upper hand compared to new reviewers?
Originally posted by
Program Manager
The rating system currently rests on two variables: activity and popularity.Activity is calculated using points allotted for four inputs: reviews (20 pts.), follow up reviews (10), comment you post on other reviews (1), comment you post in response
...
The rating system currently rests on two variables: activity and popularity.Activity is calculated using points allotted for four inputs: reviews (20 pts.), follow up reviews (10), comment you post on other reviews (1), comment you post in response to other comments/questions on your own reviews (2).Popularity is based on three factors: voting on reviews (this is the ‘how useful’ vote), editorial vote (which happens when we read your reviews), and feedback- how many comments your review generated.These are calculated daily, and in comparison to other reviewers (which is why your rating might change even if you haven’t done anything).As it stands, activity counts for 40% and popularity for 60% of rank. The new suggested ratio is that activity is 30% and popularity 70%, calculated in the same ways.With all that laid out there:What would you change about this? What do you like?