EF offers, at the bottom of the review template, to send us a reminder to do a follow up 2 months after our initial review of a product publishes. I've always assumed this was because this is considered a good time frame; time enough to see if the toy has held up, etc.
I've noticed a lot of really fast follow up reviews lately, though. Follow ups done 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, after the original review.
Which would seem okay to me if there was something significant being reported but a lot of them are just... I dunno... reiterations of what was initially said.
And so I'm curious.
What do YOU feel is a good, solid follow up time? Are follow ups necessary if nothing about your opinion has changed? (Other than to say it's held up well but that's not something that can really be claimed after a week or two, is it?)
Am I just too finicky?
I've noticed a lot of really fast follow up reviews lately, though. Follow ups done 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, after the original review.
Which would seem okay to me if there was something significant being reported but a lot of them are just... I dunno... reiterations of what was initially said.
And so I'm curious.
What do YOU feel is a good, solid follow up time? Are follow ups necessary if nothing about your opinion has changed? (Other than to say it's held up well but that's not something that can really be claimed after a week or two, is it?)
Am I just too finicky?