Im a person that HAS to have a toy that has multiple uses. (I hate glass, thats why Im selling my two and the pouch) even though, they are really pretty! The one that I have is all clear glass, with swirls that go up around the shaft and inside those swirls is a very pretty blue. Its cute, but its not ideal for me. And at $65 that I spent for it, it simply was one of those "stupid purchases" that i know not to make again. Tried it once and realized I made an oopsie LOL. Now, some of the toys that are super cute looking but are contoured to be a good massager, Ill buy those. They are cute, and I can use them for massages or sexual stimulation Im all about the value hehe
just for aesthetics?
01/21/2012
Form and function, please. I've been tempted to buy solely for looks, but I can't justify it. I don't need sex toys for decorations, but if they're pretty it does arouse me. So, I do my best to have both in a toy.
06/08/2012
form and function I agree seems to be the common response
06/24/2012
Most of the stuff I find is really pretty, BUT the only reason I'm looking is because of the function. It wouldn't matter if it was ugly as long as it did it's job.... I feel like buffalo bob, "IT puts the lotion on IT'S skin!" ha ha
06/24/2012
Quote:
Toy beauty isn't important to me because the only ones to see them is of course myself and my beautiful husband. He is handsome enough that I don't really care what toys look like.
Originally posted by
kawigrl
have you ever purchased a toy just for aesthetics and looks even though you know the shape, size or material isn't ideal. I'm considering glass toys bc they are so beautiful but I'm almost positive I wont use or enjoy such a hard toy
06/24/2012
I try to buy for function but I take the aesthetics into account.
06/24/2012
I go for both but sometimes the ugliest toys are the greatest ones. Hitatchi magic wand comes to mind, that thing is big, clunky, and ugly but oh my...
06/24/2012
Icicles #24. It's so pretty, but I hardly ever use it. I just have other glass toys that work better for me.
06/26/2012
I have only bought toys that I thought looked beautiful and were functional.
06/26/2012
function comes first but appearance is important to me
07/03/2012
Quote:
If it doesn't look pleasing, my wife won't even go near it!
Originally posted by
kawigrl
have you ever purchased a toy just for aesthetics and looks even though you know the shape, size or material isn't ideal. I'm considering glass toys bc they are so beautiful but I'm almost positive I wont use or enjoy such a hard toy
07/06/2012
Quote:
If I had an expendable income I'd totally purchase the tentacles.
Originally posted by
ToyGeek
I bought the Tentacle to display with my desktop collection of marine biology inspired non-adult toys, and I've taken chances on a few glass toys just because they were pretty.
If you've never used glass before, it might really ... more
If you've never used glass before, it might really ... more
I bought the Tentacle to display with my desktop collection of marine biology inspired non-adult toys, and I've taken chances on a few glass toys just because they were pretty.
If you've never used glass before, it might really surprise you. I say, go for it regardless, you might end up loving it. It's hard, but slick, so it might feel better than a toy of softer materials that's unexpectedly too hard for you. less
If you've never used glass before, it might really surprise you. I say, go for it regardless, you might end up loving it. It's hard, but slick, so it might feel better than a toy of softer materials that's unexpectedly too hard for you. less
Otherwise, I find that most of the toys I want are very aesthetically pleasing to me.
07/28/2012
I'm more likely to buy a toy if it's pretty, but I don't buy it solely because it's pretty. It still has to be functional
08/03/2012
I have the original Hello Kitty vibrator and have thought about getting the Bondage Duckie vibrator just to sit on my shelf.
I but more for use than looks.
I but more for use than looks.
08/16/2012
I have a bunch of glass pieces that I bought just because they are pretty.... BUT I ended up liking most all of them for play too!
08/16/2012
Most of the time I go for function, but there are some toys that make it tempting just to get (even if I might not use them). Like the Wonderland toys... not sure I'd use them much but they'd be cool to have.
08/16/2012
c365
Sure, I may want to try a different type of product.
08/18/2012
The saying from the architecture world, "form follows function" is true.
08/19/2012
Quote:
Since when? That rule has numerous counterexamples.
Originally posted by
bayosgirl
The saying from the architecture world, "form follows function" is true.
08/19/2012
it's hard to resist a toy that looks really cute...but I generally try to mix pleasure and good looks
08/26/2012
if i'm not gonna use it then i wont buy it
10/19/2012
Looks and pleasure, wouldn't buy one I won't use.
10/20/2012
We buy mostly for function, but I try and get things that look great, my wife just loves ones that work well and looks good. (But then again, who doesn't?)
10/20/2012
I really try to do both!
10/22/2012
Would purchase "decorative accessories" if the price is right
11/17/2012
I really care a lot more about the function than the design for myself
11/17/2012
Great designs and beautiful glass are something I love so long as it also is functional for me.
11/27/2012
I'm attracted to looks first, but then I read reviews to see if it would be useful to me.
11/27/2012
i did once - I totally regretted it. I no longer have it either.
11/27/2012