Alright, so a bit of backstory
I'm a big gal. I have decent sized breasts. If I lost the weight as my doc wishes, I will lose considerable mass from my breasts. I refuse to cope with having smaller breasts. I've lived with this size all my life and wrong as it may be, I'm attached. I need them.
So assuming I lost weight I would get breast augmentation to regain the lost mass. My skin isn't very elastic, so it'd likely still be stretched anyways and would leave smaller breasts looking like sad little potato sacks.
Now, every person I have discussed this with has has a reaction that was less than pleasant. People that think I am sexy now tell me I would not only be less sexy or no longer sexy, but that I "would be making a mistake" and it is "a terrible decision". Seeing as falsies are getting better every day, and seeing as they can actually use other body fat instead of synthetic materials now- I am really failing to see the issue.
Sure there is the horror story of the 'botched boob job', but thats usually when very small girls try to go to a huge size, or when the doctor is poorly trained, there are lots of factors. And while it is still relatively expensive, its come down a lot in recent years and is much more approachable to the everyday girl.
My question is this:
Why does EVERYONE seem to hate fake boobs?
What makes them, if they are the same size, worse than the old boobs, assuming a woman is getting them as a 'replacement'?
Do you believe natural breasts are better than fake breasts? if so, why?
In my opinion, boobs are boobs. Sure there may be some texture differences- WHO CARES? Girls with fake ones can still give tit jobs, I've seen it. They're still pretty natural looking if they are done right, and they're plenty soft enough to lay on. So... though I, too, have heard the nightmarish botched boob job stories, I can't say I see the reason for extreme dislike to the point of making someone who is sexy completely unsexy. Any opinions? am I just missing something that makes them evil, or..?
I'm a big gal. I have decent sized breasts. If I lost the weight as my doc wishes, I will lose considerable mass from my breasts. I refuse to cope with having smaller breasts. I've lived with this size all my life and wrong as it may be, I'm attached. I need them.
So assuming I lost weight I would get breast augmentation to regain the lost mass. My skin isn't very elastic, so it'd likely still be stretched anyways and would leave smaller breasts looking like sad little potato sacks.
Now, every person I have discussed this with has has a reaction that was less than pleasant. People that think I am sexy now tell me I would not only be less sexy or no longer sexy, but that I "would be making a mistake" and it is "a terrible decision". Seeing as falsies are getting better every day, and seeing as they can actually use other body fat instead of synthetic materials now- I am really failing to see the issue.
Sure there is the horror story of the 'botched boob job', but thats usually when very small girls try to go to a huge size, or when the doctor is poorly trained, there are lots of factors. And while it is still relatively expensive, its come down a lot in recent years and is much more approachable to the everyday girl.
My question is this:
Why does EVERYONE seem to hate fake boobs?
What makes them, if they are the same size, worse than the old boobs, assuming a woman is getting them as a 'replacement'?
Do you believe natural breasts are better than fake breasts? if so, why?
In my opinion, boobs are boobs. Sure there may be some texture differences- WHO CARES? Girls with fake ones can still give tit jobs, I've seen it. They're still pretty natural looking if they are done right, and they're plenty soft enough to lay on. So... though I, too, have heard the nightmarish botched boob job stories, I can't say I see the reason for extreme dislike to the point of making someone who is sexy completely unsexy. Any opinions? am I just missing something that makes them evil, or..?