Add resource

Not Sure What the Fuss is About

A solid masturbator that does feel good, but doesn't really do much to stand out beyond far cheaper alternatives. Unless one of the features unique to this device sells you, look for cheaper toys.
Published:
Pros:
Hard plastic case is easy and handy to use, suction cap, easy to clean, pornstar molded.
Cons:
Similar toys can be had for cheaper, interior is far too subtle.
Rating by reviewer:
3
useful review
The fleshlight is kind of infamous in the sex toy circle as the veritable Cadillac of vagina surrogates—the be-all, end-all of male masturbators. Chances are if you've seen any such device advertised elsewhere on the internet, it's this one. That being said, I've tried a handful of other such toys of varying quality, so I had some experiences to compare this with.

The fleshlight comes packaged in a nifty little can. It's a pretty hefty, large toy, actually. And don't listen to anyone—unless you're unfathomably naive, there's no mistaking this for a flashlight. The fleshlight definitely has some cool features when it comes to masturbators: the plastic case makes it very easy to hold and control. One of the biggest annoyances with these things is the soft ones where it gets so lubey that it's hard to hold on when you're going at it. Another cool feature is the cap on either end. The front end cap goes over the entrance and makes it easy to keep it free of dust and such. The other cap on the other end lets you control the amount of suction created by the insert. The effect is subtle, but fun to play with and definitely interesting to use. It does result in a lot of airy noise when all that air is getting pushed through. This fleshlight's exterior is molded from Raven Riley, which is definitely a plus if you're a fan. The insert is, as it shows, removable, which makes cleaning this up a breeze. Air-drying the material as you're supposed to can be an inconvenience, depending on your living arrangement.

Despite these pros, there's really not a whole lot to write home about with regard to the experience here. If you take a look at the cross-view of the inside of the insert, it looks very promising. The inside looks to be modeled moderately closely after actual female anatomy, but some of the features are so deep inside it's worthless to a lot of guys. My experience, while definitely great and a wonderful step up from just hands, wasn't a whole lot different from other such toys. The material is nice, and it feels as though it will last longer than most other cheaper toys, but the exact same sensations can be felt from toys less than half the price. Also, I don't know how long they expect you to soak this thing in hot water to get it to retain heat for more than thirty seconds, but it was far too long for my patience (even after 5-10 minutes in too-hot-to-hold-your-hand-in water, the insert returned to room temperature within a minute). The main draw here, by my logic, is the pornstar molding, which I'm sure for some people is much more of a selling point than others. To whom it may concern, it's an important point.

Bottom line is, I don't really recommend shelling out for this unless one of the features relatively unique to this device (the case, suction control, pornstar mold, material, etc), you can get a more-than-comparable fix for much less.
Follow-up commentary
There is nothing new to say here. I stopped using this a long time ago, and I no longer have it. It's definitely a high-quality toy, but I just got bored of it. Keep that in mind if you're looking to purchase it. There are cheaper, comparable alternatives.
This product was provided at a discounted price in exchange for an unbiased review. This review is in compliance with the FTC guidelines.
Become a Reviewer. Get free toys. Enjoy Special Deals
This review was edited by
  • Sir Sir
  • Rank:
     
    8
  • Edited reviews: 435
Do you like this review?
Comments
  • Sir
    Sir  
    Good job on this review, it was well-written.
  • Kayla
    Kayla  
    Good job on the review. I highly recommend trying another, more intense texture; the Lotus texture is a pretty subtle texture. The Twista or STU both provide a lot more intense sensations. The Lotus, not so much.
  • B8trDude
    B8trDude  
    Sorry you didn't have a better experience. While you didn't mention the texture, I think it's the "Lotus." Although I don't have that one, it seems that very few guys like it - as you implied, the best parts are too hard to reach. I've got the STU which is great, as well as the Twista; I like the STU better.
  • Porfiriato
    Porfiriato  
    Thanks for the review, it's always good to hear what people didn't like about toys that everyone seems to either love or want.
  • BBW Talks Toys
    BBW Talks Toys  
    If you have the Lotus, that is generally the problem. Need to be well over the 6.5 inch mark to really feel the different chambers.
  • Illusion
    Illusion  
    Thanks for the comments. The insert is indeed the Lotus texture. For what it's worth, I'd be interested in trying out the other inserts (particularly the tighter ones) but I don't think I'm spending any money on them anytime soon!
  • SMichelle
    SMichelle  
    Sorry this sounds like it was such a disappointment... Thanks for the review though.
Forum
No discussions yet.
Thank you for viewing Fleshlight girls Raven Riley – masturbation sleeve review page!