Good, basic all around lubricant
For the price, this is a very good lubricant that I would purchase again. The only drawback is, it is not scented or flavored and so isn't ideal for any type of oral. Otherwise, it is suited perfectly for all other types of sexual play or intercourse excluding only anal due to its relative thinness.Published: March 30, 2011
Pros:
No scent whatsoever, long-lasting, and versatile.
Cons:
Can be a bit sticky.
Follow-up commentary
3 months after original review
I've had no problems since first trying this gel that I haven't already noted. I did notice that it does not stain sheets or clothing, so that's a definite plus!
This content is the opinion of the submitting contributor and is not endorsed by EdenFantasys.com
About author
This review was edited by
-
Miss Cinnamon
- Edited reviews: 80
Forum
-
Anyone else?
-
I have been using ID pleasure for years. I tried WET and it seemed to be a bit more watered down to me. Not a bad thing just not my thing.
Anyonee lse have this going for you too? -
I used to hate Wet products, they came off as cheap.
Until I tried their synergy line. I fell in love with both the original, and the tingle lubricant.
The Synergy is water and silicone mixed, which produces a gel. I hate water down lubricants.
As long as you don't use it with silicone toys, its fine. -
I used to feel the same way about wet
5 posts Read all -
-
Why not the same looking containers for this product?
-
Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?
-
Quote: Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?I'd assume that's just the bottles that the manufacturers felt were best for their item. Certain sizes will do better certain ways because of how they have to flex to squeeze the lube out.
Personally I don't care either way for stuff like this, none of the bottles are something I would want to display and the ease of use on all of them seems about the same, so it's not going to make a difference to me between the options. -
Quote: Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?At the size of the bottles for those smaller ones, the "neat" bottle wouldn't work. The little "handle hold" on the side of the bottle would actually be the entire length of the bottle. There just isn't enough product to warrant making the bigger bottle. However, if you contact Wet Lubricants, they always take suggestions well and could explain it further.
7 posts Read all -
Thank you for viewing Wet gel lubricant review page!
Excellent 1st review. Thanks
If you review another lube, you might want to discuss the ingredients, because some users will be interested in that information. Thanks, good review!
Thanks so much for the advice, I'd appreciate any more feedback. Good or Bad
It was a good review. I use this myself, but when I run out I want to try something different.
Every single review says the same thing about the cons - gotta keep away from this.