Wet, ...but wild?
This product is not in fact exciting, but if you are short on a dime and you need it, I wouldn't be adverse to purchasing it.Published: February 24, 2011
Pros:
It's wet. It does "supplement your natural moisture".
Cons:
This product could be more silky. The chemicals tend to dry the skin out like cheap lotion.
I like this product because it gets the job done. It does what it is marketed to do, which is to lubricate. The simple clear bottle packaging makes it discreet; in fact, when my five year old found it, he thought it was hand sanitizer. Its size makes it less noticeable for the more modest consumer and makes it easier for traveling because I can throw it in my suitcase, my overnight bag, or even my purse and it does not take up much space.
The product is water based, and I found this awkward when I was using it in the shower. It kept running off. An improvement would be to increase the viscosity or thickness to prevent this in the upright position. There were no problems sitting or laying down.
Now, unlike some products, I did have to use a bit more than I expected, but that may be just my personal preference. The smell isn't anything to die for but it isn't pungent either as long as you are using it alone. If you are using this with a partner, a romantic ending would be to take time to treat your lover to a shower, because mixed with the combining bodily fluids it smells like plastic. I did get the original scent, so I wasn't expecting sunshine and spring days.
Like I have previously mentioned, it is water based which is nice, but it advertises that it's "Always Silky" which isn't true. It was never silky to begin with. It's water based. If it were oil based, then it would be silky. False advertising is false advertising. This product is a representation of the company, just like a person is for a business. Then again, you are paying less than five dollars for this product. You are just getting exactly what you paid for, but overall it is a decent product if you want something cheap.
The product is water based, and I found this awkward when I was using it in the shower. It kept running off. An improvement would be to increase the viscosity or thickness to prevent this in the upright position. There were no problems sitting or laying down.
Now, unlike some products, I did have to use a bit more than I expected, but that may be just my personal preference. The smell isn't anything to die for but it isn't pungent either as long as you are using it alone. If you are using this with a partner, a romantic ending would be to take time to treat your lover to a shower, because mixed with the combining bodily fluids it smells like plastic. I did get the original scent, so I wasn't expecting sunshine and spring days.
Like I have previously mentioned, it is water based which is nice, but it advertises that it's "Always Silky" which isn't true. It was never silky to begin with. It's water based. If it were oil based, then it would be silky. False advertising is false advertising. This product is a representation of the company, just like a person is for a business. Then again, you are paying less than five dollars for this product. You are just getting exactly what you paid for, but overall it is a decent product if you want something cheap.
Experience
A friend of mine picked up this product for me, and I was removing the price tag and seals while she and I were talking on the phone. Note: the inside label says "Spills Immediately". I interrupt her diatribe of why people aren't having good sex with:
"IT'S ALL OVER ME!"
"What's all over you!"
"The lubricant!"
"Oh my god b-. I can't leave you alone for a minute."
"IT'S ALL OVER ME!"
"What's all over you!"
"The lubricant!"
"Oh my god b-. I can't leave you alone for a minute."
Follow-up commentary
2 months after original review
I still dislike this lube. It stinks, literally. The odor is ridiculous. If you follow toy play with oral, do not with this product. It tastes bad enough to make you want to stop thinking about what your partner would enjoy from you. It's too sticky. It isn't silky. You have to use more than typically necessary. I just absolutely detest using this product unless I absolutely have to.
This content is the opinion of the submitting contributor and is not endorsed by EdenFantasys.com
This review was edited by
-
Tori Rebel
- Edited reviews: 331
- Graduated students: 11
Forum
-
Anyone else?
-
I have been using ID pleasure for years. I tried WET and it seemed to be a bit more watered down to me. Not a bad thing just not my thing.
Anyonee lse have this going for you too? -
I used to hate Wet products, they came off as cheap.
Until I tried their synergy line. I fell in love with both the original, and the tingle lubricant.
The Synergy is water and silicone mixed, which produces a gel. I hate water down lubricants.
As long as you don't use it with silicone toys, its fine. -
I used to feel the same way about wet
5 posts Read all -
-
Why not the same looking containers for this product?
-
Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?
-
Quote: Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?I'd assume that's just the bottles that the manufacturers felt were best for their item. Certain sizes will do better certain ways because of how they have to flex to squeeze the lube out.
Personally I don't care either way for stuff like this, none of the bottles are something I would want to display and the ease of use on all of them seems about the same, so it's not going to make a difference to me between the options. -
Quote: Why is the 3.5, the 4.8, and the 10 oz bottles of this lubricant sold in cool looking bottles, while the 0.8 amount and the 1.5 sold in smaller, weirder shapes? Why not miniatures of the cooler versions? Why a toothpaste looking bottle and a hand sanitizer looking bottle? Comments? Agreements?At the size of the bottles for those smaller ones, the "neat" bottle wouldn't work. The little "handle hold" on the side of the bottle would actually be the entire length of the bottle. There just isn't enough product to warrant making the bigger bottle. However, if you contact Wet Lubricants, they always take suggestions well and could explain it further.
7 posts Read all -
Thank you for viewing Wet gel lubricant – water based lube review page!



Thanks for the review.
Thanks for the review. Sorry it didn't work well for you.
Thanks for the review