Traditional vibrator discontinued
by Shaki Toys

Did . . . did you Bedazzle my vibrator??

This vibrator is made for novelty, not functionality, which means that it has sacrificed function for form. While the jewels give it a young (very young) and bright feel, they end up limiting the kinds of activities you can do with the vibrator. Unless you love shiny things on absolutely everything, I would buy a different vibrator.
Published:
Pros
Waterproof
Good clitoral stimulation
Cons
Odd buzzing at high speeds
Jewels make insertion uncomfortable
Jewels make cleaning more difficult
Rating by reviewer:
2
useful review
I'm really not sure what demographic this vibrator is being marketed to. Maybe I, as a man, am not as in touch with what woman today want in a sex toy. What I do know is that this vibrator looks like something a 12 year old found in her mother's closet and Bedazzled to match her My Little Ponies.

The vibrator came in a bright aqua plastic box, and features a clear plastic removable cover, variable speed, and a multitude of colored plastic jewels. Each of the jewels are slightly recessed into the plastic body of the vibrator, and for the most part they seem firmly placed to the touch. The buzz and bee produced by this vibrator is almost comparable to that of similar sized vibrators, perhaps a little weaker overall. However, at max speed, there is a very distinct increase in sound. It is a harsh buzz, and is most likely caused by a few of the less secure jewels vibrating against the plastic base. If nothing else, it shows that the construction may not be of top quality.

While I did mention that the jewels were set into the plastic of the vibrator and not simply glued to the surface, some of the jewels do seem to have hard edges which try catch when you move across them. I was hesitant to try and insert it into my wife's vagina, but we took it slow with a decent amount of lube. Her actual words during the experience were "Well, it's not unpleasant." But if you could here the intonation, it was like saying her cousin's cooking is not terrible. She also mentioned that if felt like the jewels would catch and pull at the flesh at any moment, which was not a good feeling to have. It was agreed without much debate that this would not be the best toy to be used inside body cavities. Also, because of all the nooks and crannies created by the set jewels, cleaning was more of a hassle than with other smooth vibrators. Trying to clean it with one of our rags resulted in a lot of loose threads being pulled apart.

Since insertion was out as an option, the vibrator was relegated to clitoris stimulation duty. The length of the vibrator made it a little more difficult to maneuver between our bodies during intercourse, but it did as well as any other comparably sized vibrator. The entire vibrator is also waterproof to within reason, working flawlessly to the depth of a reasonably sized bath tub.

I think the makers of this sex toy intended for it to be one of those toys which would be displayed like a trophy by people who are more open to their sexual exploits. However, it falls more to the side of Barbie's dream house than it does a tasteful art piece. Unless you enjoy colored gemstones and need a vibrator to go with your rhinestone decor, I would suggest moving on to other more traditional toys.
This product was provided free of charge to the reviewer. This review is in compliance with the FTC guidelines.

EdenFantasys Review Program

  • Get Free Toys
  • Enjoy Special Deals
Become a Reviewer
My First sight love tags
  • Who / How / What
    [ ? ]
    Who might this product be best for? How is it best used? What are the best circumstances or situations for using this product?
    • Couple foreplay/after climax play
    • Young couples
  • Where
    [ ? ]
    Where / what types of places can this product be used?
    • Anywhere
Comments
Subscribe to comments
  • Contributor: LicentiouslyYours
    I see what you mean about the jewels, they look like they would be uncomfortable!
  • Contributor: MuffysPinguLove
    It's pretty, but looks pretty impractical Wondering
  • Contributor: Sundae
    You mention that the vibe has a clear, removable cover and I can see that in the photos, can it be used with that on? It seems to make more sense that way, you can use it without having your bits and pieces catch on the jewels, but you can take it off if it ever needs a clean.
  • Contributor: LikeSunshineDust
    I didn't realize the plastic sheath came off. From the looks of the pictures, I thought it was attached to the vibe.
  • Contributor: removedacnt
    Cute, but I don't think I would use it. Thanks for the review.
  • Contributor: Jul!a
    It's cute, and I absolutely love your title, lol.

    Thanks for the review Smile
  • Contributor: Magician
    Reply to Sundae: It did cross our minds to use the cover on in order facilitate better insertion. There were a few problems, however, that we immediately noticed:

    The vibrator, once turned on, would make an annoyingly horrid buzzing sound. Since the plastic cover only contacted the base of the vibrator, that contact point vibrated against one another to produce a very loud noise.

    Since the only point of contact is at the base of the vibrator when the cover is on, vibrations do not travel as far, and thus the use of the vibrator is diminished.

    Once inserted, the cover would come off since the friction between the cover and the vagina was stronger than the friction between the cover and the vibrator. It became unwieldy to use.

    I hope that was clear and helpful.
  • Contributor: Sammi
    It does look bedazzled Smile
    Nice review!
  • Contributor: Laccaria
    "Bedazzled" that's the perfect description. Your wife is far braver than I am. I refused to try this toy without the cover even though, as you mention, there are issues with the cover. It's interesting that your cover was also "removable." I really thought that it was meant to be glued down and mine was just broken. Maybe it is actually meant to be that way??? Either way, nice review.
  • Contributor: Sera
    Good review.
  • Contributor: Elliotstar
    Haha, I'd be a little afraid to try this - the fake jewels don't look like they'd clean easily.
  • Contributor: mama2007
    interesting
  • Contributor: Kdlips
    Good review.
  • Contributor: NarcissisticLust
    My goodness this toy is flawed! Because it would be silly to put a clear sleeve over a vibrator and only attach it at the base, I assumed the jewels were glued to the core then were coated in a thick layer of clear plastic, but they went with option A it seems. Wow, the sleeve is not glued on and the company expects you to enjoy the sharp and glue covered edges of the jewels! I'm sorry you had such a miserable experience with this toy, it was a free gift with my last purchase on EF and now I wish I hadn't accepted it. Thank you for a good review.
  • Contributor: callsignhusker
    well done review!
  • Contributor: bluekaren
    I loved you opening line! I just got this free with my order. I was pretty excited about since it looks so pretty, sucky that it is so flawed!
  • Contributor: TheSlyFox
    Thanks for the review.
Forum
Discussion Posts Last Update
Cockjazzling? 19
Thank you for viewing First sight love – traditional vibrator review page!