Infertility is not a light subject. The chances are that you know individuals who have had trouble conceiving children (or you, yourself may be struggling). While the statistics are a little different among developed countries, it’s a conservative estimate to say that about ten percent of couples will experience fertility issues while trying to conceive.
Usually, a couple will be referred to a fertility clinic anywhere from six months to two years after trying to conceive naturally. This number changes depending on where you live and the age of the female. The clinic will use their resources to determine the cause for infertility and potential ways to conceive a child.
The causes for infertility are plenty, but most issues can fall into one of these categories: age related infertility, congenital defects of one or both partners, trauma and injury, hormonal fluctuations, and anatomical abnormality. The nature of one or both spouse’s infertility will be the core of the battle plan for a biological child.
However, this is where ethics can become a bit grey. While everyone should have the right to have biological children, a question can be posed: When does the desire and right to have a biological child become too great?
This is a large and sensitive issue and this article does not intend to declare what is “right” or “wrong." It is simply to create a discussion and ask questions. Given the data and information we have about fertility, sterility, clinics, and treatments such as IVF or in-vitro fertilization, it’s time to think of such questions. One being: is there a point where a couple should not pursue biological children?
Committing to IVF is not a guaranteed success. Sometimes the cycles will fail for multiple reasons. To summarize, IVF is a technique used in which the egg cell is fertilized by sperm in a laboratory environment. Generally, multiple eggs are fertilized and then observed in the lab for progress and vitality. If the eggs remain vital and multiply, they can then be implanted into the uterus. Sometimes the eggs do not grow once fertilized. Many times, the egg will not implant into the uterus and other times it will implant only to stop growing shortly after.
Because of these challenges, IVF leads to more multiple births compared to naturally conceiving couples. The reason for the multiple births is because more than one egg is generally placed in the uterus during an IVF cycle. This lowers the number of cycles a couple might have to go through to conceive, for every cycle of IVF can be very expensive. Yet, an already high-risk pregnancy becomes a higher risk when multiple births are involved. This leads to increased stress on the mother.
Also, once a child by IVF is conceived and implanted, there are other potential challenges. The National Birth Defects Study in the U.S. found that children born to IVF are more likely to have defects such as septal heart defects and cleft palate.
There is also a theory that children born to IVF and similar treatments are more likely to get sick with certain genetic disorders. This theory takes more of an evolutionary backing, but is still more of an opinion as studies are currently being conducted. It is thought that sterility (not in incidents of trauma) can occur for a reason. One reason could be that the resulting children could be at greater risks of certain genetic ailments. It could be summed as Mother Nature being Mother Nature.
Regardless, there are other reasons to look at IVF and such treatments. For example, let’s say the potential father has a spermatogenesis issue. This means he is unable to form healthy sperm. There is a treatment called ICSI, or Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, that can be used where the sperm is injected directly into the egg. This form of infertility can be genetic. If it is, a father can pass it on to every son he has. This can create a paternal line of sterile individuals for generations.
Usually, a couple will be referred to a fertility clinic anywhere from six months to two years after trying to conceive naturally. This number changes depending on where you live and the age of the female. The clinic will use their resources to determine the cause for infertility and potential ways to conceive a child.
The causes for infertility are plenty, but most issues can fall into one of these categories: age related infertility, congenital defects of one or both partners, trauma and injury, hormonal fluctuations, and anatomical abnormality. The nature of one or both spouse’s infertility will be the core of the battle plan for a biological child.
However, this is where ethics can become a bit grey. While everyone should have the right to have biological children, a question can be posed: When does the desire and right to have a biological child become too great?
This is a large and sensitive issue and this article does not intend to declare what is “right” or “wrong." It is simply to create a discussion and ask questions. Given the data and information we have about fertility, sterility, clinics, and treatments such as IVF or in-vitro fertilization, it’s time to think of such questions. One being: is there a point where a couple should not pursue biological children?
Committing to IVF is not a guaranteed success. Sometimes the cycles will fail for multiple reasons. To summarize, IVF is a technique used in which the egg cell is fertilized by sperm in a laboratory environment. Generally, multiple eggs are fertilized and then observed in the lab for progress and vitality. If the eggs remain vital and multiply, they can then be implanted into the uterus. Sometimes the eggs do not grow once fertilized. Many times, the egg will not implant into the uterus and other times it will implant only to stop growing shortly after.
Because of these challenges, IVF leads to more multiple births compared to naturally conceiving couples. The reason for the multiple births is because more than one egg is generally placed in the uterus during an IVF cycle. This lowers the number of cycles a couple might have to go through to conceive, for every cycle of IVF can be very expensive. Yet, an already high-risk pregnancy becomes a higher risk when multiple births are involved. This leads to increased stress on the mother.
Also, once a child by IVF is conceived and implanted, there are other potential challenges. The National Birth Defects Study in the U.S. found that children born to IVF are more likely to have defects such as septal heart defects and cleft palate.
There is also a theory that children born to IVF and similar treatments are more likely to get sick with certain genetic disorders. This theory takes more of an evolutionary backing, but is still more of an opinion as studies are currently being conducted. It is thought that sterility (not in incidents of trauma) can occur for a reason. One reason could be that the resulting children could be at greater risks of certain genetic ailments. It could be summed as Mother Nature being Mother Nature.
Regardless, there are other reasons to look at IVF and such treatments. For example, let’s say the potential father has a spermatogenesis issue. This means he is unable to form healthy sperm. There is a treatment called ICSI, or Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, that can be used where the sperm is injected directly into the egg. This form of infertility can be genetic. If it is, a father can pass it on to every son he has. This can create a paternal line of sterile individuals for generations.
Most people with diseases, either genetic or otherwise, are generally glad to be alive. I know. I'm one of them. But even if the truth were otherwise, even if every less-than-perfect person were completely miserable, to give the government the power to say who is allowed to reproduce and who isn't is a far worse outcome than the "problem" it is meant to solve.