is not attracted to men but gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated? (and not being sucked by a guy or being the active partner)
Featured by EdenFantasys
How would you classify a guy who
07/20/2011
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Pretty sure hubs doesn't find guys to be romantically attractive and he definitely loves me to death (and my body) so I chose open minded and kinky. This is something we talk about frequently and have actually done one time (recently).
I am not romantically attracted to women but if I saw a hot chick and the circumstances were right, I'd be open to bringing her home to play with. It wouldn't be a hard threesome, more like him watching us play. Just as I would watch him play with a guy.
I am not romantically attracted to women but if I saw a hot chick and the circumstances were right, I'd be open to bringing her home to play with. It wouldn't be a hard threesome, more like him watching us play. Just as I would watch him play with a guy.
07/20/2011
Open minded and kinky
07/20/2011
Still learning just what it is that he likes.
07/20/2011
"gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated?"
I consider that homosexual, unless he likes having sex with women too. Those parts are on a guy, so he is attracted to them.
I consider that homosexual, unless he likes having sex with women too. Those parts are on a guy, so he is attracted to them.
07/20/2011
I think they can be whatever they want! Cocks are pretty darn awesome; I'd take one over a vagina any day. If the said person is uncomfortable doing anything with men, then a strap-on harness and a realistic dildo on a female may make his night. If the person wants to play with a male-bodied person, go for it, but at the same time, remember that there are alternatives (harness, realistic dildos, etc.), and "bending" gender rules can be fun.
07/20/2011
Heteroflexible if anything due to his interest in play.
07/20/2011
Quote:
This is exactly what I was thinking...
Originally posted by
~LaUr3n~
"gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated?"
I consider that homosexual, unless he likes having sex with women too. Those parts are on a guy, so he is attracted to them.
I consider that homosexual, unless he likes having sex with women too. Those parts are on a guy, so he is attracted to them.
07/20/2011
Doesn't matter what I would classify them as---how they classify themselves is what matters. The definitions I hear tossed around are that men who like transexuals are still commonly straight---as in, they are attracted to feminine body types and female secondary sex characteristics, but they just also happen to think cocks are awesome.
But when you start dabbling around these regions, it's all pretty fluid. Someone can call him/herself whatever he/she thinks fits.
I wouldn't be squicked out in the slightest if I had a male partner who felt the way you described, as long as he liked/desired my (100% female) body too.
But when you start dabbling around these regions, it's all pretty fluid. Someone can call him/herself whatever he/she thinks fits.
I wouldn't be squicked out in the slightest if I had a male partner who felt the way you described, as long as he liked/desired my (100% female) body too.
07/20/2011
I chose "other," because it isn't my place to classify anyone. They classify themselves as whatever they want to classify themselves as.
07/20/2011
Quote:
bicourious or denying ur true bisexual nature really dunno dunno the guy
Originally posted by
Trillian
is not attracted to men but gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated? (and not being sucked by a guy or being the active partner)
07/20/2011
Quote:
I'm with Sir. The terms should be used to reflect the self and how one internalizes their sexuality, not a bin for someone else to toss objects in. The facts on the surface can mean very very little with whats underneath.
Originally posted by
Sir
I chose "other," because it isn't my place to classify anyone. They classify themselves as whatever they want to classify themselves as.
And yet...
If I had a male friend that came to me and said 'I'M NOT GAY, but I do this and this and this....', I'd probably first open the discussion with bisexuality.
07/20/2011
Quote:
I think that would fall under open minded and kinky leading into bi-curious. It really depends on how the guy, himself, would classify his attraction. I have two partners who are decidedly hetero but still get off on fantasies where they are being forced to suck cock or being taken forcefully....it's a power trade fantasy not a desire to be with a guy. A strap on and a realistic dildo seems to fill that fantasy nicely!
Originally posted by
Trillian
is not attracted to men but gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated? (and not being sucked by a guy or being the active partner)
07/21/2011
Quote:
Very comfortable with his sexuality, open minded, kinky and most important; my kind of guy... you have my respect.
Originally posted by
Trillian
is not attracted to men but gets turned on by cock and the idea of sucking them and being penetrated? (and not being sucked by a guy or being the active partner)
07/23/2011
A very comfortable person, possibly still discovering himself ^_^
07/23/2011
Quote:
I agree.
Originally posted by
systematicweasel
A very comfortable person, possibly still discovering himself ^_^
However perhaps the bigger question is why would you need to "classify a guy who" enjoys or engages in any kind of legal adult activities. Many of us are full of contradictions that defy label or classification. And I'm OK with that.
07/23/2011
Not all guys have cocks and not all women don't. If he doesn't like men then he's straight, who cares about the genitals.
07/24/2011
I wouldn't classify him myself. But, if pressed probably (as Airen said) somewhere between kinky/open and bicurious.
Kayla had some good ideas for a guy who was curious about cock but didn't want to really have sex with an other man. Or maybe he does want to go all the way with an other man. I say, be who you are, and be happy with it. You can usually find someone to play with, no matter what you like to do.
Discovering your sexuality and opening your life and your mind is a fascinating thing!
But, please be careful and use safer sex.
Kayla had some good ideas for a guy who was curious about cock but didn't want to really have sex with an other man. Or maybe he does want to go all the way with an other man. I say, be who you are, and be happy with it. You can usually find someone to play with, no matter what you like to do.
Discovering your sexuality and opening your life and your mind is a fascinating thing!
But, please be careful and use safer sex.
07/27/2011
Forget the labels. Labels are where homophodia and heterophodia comes from.
07/29/2011
Steve Martin 1970's voice:
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected.
What Sir and bievan say!
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected.
What Sir and bievan say!
07/29/2011
I hate labels -.- I'm never sure what to "classify" myself as either. And usually what I say I "am" people take the wrong way and over or under estimate my experience. It's a pain.
07/29/2011
Quote:
Well said.
Originally posted by
El-Jaro
Steve Martin 1970's voice:
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected. ... more
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected. ... more
Steve Martin 1970's voice:
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected.
What Sir and bievan say! less
"Wild and crazy guy!"
I wouldn't spend too much time classifying other people. Attaching a definition to something/someone just sets the stage poorly for when it/they do something unexpected.
What Sir and bievan say! less
07/29/2011
Quote:
I agree with SiNn.
Originally posted by
SiNn
bicourious or denying ur true bisexual nature really dunno dunno the guy
08/21/2011
I put other. Idk how I would label that. I'm not so worried about labels though. I think that the person should experiment if they want to and come up with their own label, if they want one, or if they choose to ignore it, then that's their choice. It's all about personal choice, really. I don't think it's for someone else to decide.
08/22/2011
Liking men and liking cock are two different things. Based on the description it's possible that he could fulfill his desires with a woman who straps it on.
09/09/2011
I'd go with bisexual (or at least bicurious, if he's never done it before), though I do agree with everyone who said that the guy should choose his own labels based on how he feels.
09/10/2011
Thats an interesting question... I would say open minded
09/14/2011
truth be told; I think emotional attraction is just as important as sexual attraction, when it comes to a person's sexual identity.
10/31/2011
Bicurious boarder lining on Bisexual. I think if your turned on by cock, chances are your turned on by what its attached to.
10/31/2011
I'd just classify him as a guy
11/01/2011