I have to disagree. Although the female form is attractive, many people feel the male form is absolutely sublime! Michelangelo actually used male models for many of his paintings of females, and simply added breasts either with or without any hip and belly padding. Many Renaissance artists and even artists today, as well as lay people think the male form is absolutely beautiful.

Although I enjoy looking at a beautiful, well built woman, I enjoy the look of a man's body and face much more. The firm defined pecs, the abdominal muscles, the slightly jutting slim hips, sliding into the pelvic region, those shoulders. OMG, the shoulders of a finely built man.

Not to mention the other assets of men. Unlike some, I like the way penis and testes look. I think they are very attractive.

I prefer porn where the man is nicely built and is shown. We have a DVD where you rarely see the guys. There are women in the way the entire time. It's a crappy movie anyway. The scenes go on too long, the women are, face it, not very attractive, they men are a bit better looking, but you don't get to see them unless they are coming. We rarely watch it.

But, yes, I imagine, as a lot of porn is made "for men" you see the women more. There is more and more porn made for women, and the hetero porn made "for women" or "for couples" tends to have better shots of the men, better looking men, and tends to linger on them.

I defy anyone to look at this and tell me it isn't attractive. (OK, I didn't put one of him nude, as I thought it wasn't appropriate. But, I can assure you, he's even better looking with nothing on.
Marco Bandaras