Dear Administrators,
This post regarding EF's link-redirecting coding was deleted today, as you are probably aware. I am wondering if Edenfantasys plans on addressing this; maybe they deleted the thread in order to start a new one to do damage control in. If this is the case, I understand, but if it's not and EF plans on ignoring this then I am truly offended and concerned with the integrity of this community. I'm trying very hard to understand why Edenfantasys would deleted a thread in which people were all respectfully and civilly asking for answers about what appears to be a tremendously unethical practice of Edenfantasys. There was no libelous slandering, there was no name calling, and the accusations were not wild and unfounded: they were easy to prove by simply disabling JavaScript. This was an entirely adult conversation that someone took it upon themselves to erase, and I really would like an explanation. I don't understand the premise on which this thread was deemed worthy of deletion, and I'm really genuinely upset because I was one of the people that asked for answers.
I have disabled JavaScript and tested at least three other popular sex toy websites and none of them use this recursive technology. As far as I can tell, Edenfantasys is the only company among the sex toy depot big rigs that uses this. It's also one that claims to value community, and furthermore, one in which people "speak up" and ask questions and share their concerns. Well, I am concerned. I am concerned about the practice and I am concerned about the deleted post. And I am speaking up for a second time. This is such a blatantly unethical practice that it actually violates Google's webmaster guidelines. It is deceptive and harmful to dozens and dozens of private business endeavors and companies that make Edenfantasys what it is today.
I would really appreciate a response on this: both the post deletion and this coding. Surely we can do this openly and honestly, and of course, with the transparency that Edenfantasys claims to value so much. Thank you very much for reading.
SL&L
This post regarding EF's link-redirecting coding was deleted today, as you are probably aware. I am wondering if Edenfantasys plans on addressing this; maybe they deleted the thread in order to start a new one to do damage control in. If this is the case, I understand, but if it's not and EF plans on ignoring this then I am truly offended and concerned with the integrity of this community. I'm trying very hard to understand why Edenfantasys would deleted a thread in which people were all respectfully and civilly asking for answers about what appears to be a tremendously unethical practice of Edenfantasys. There was no libelous slandering, there was no name calling, and the accusations were not wild and unfounded: they were easy to prove by simply disabling JavaScript. This was an entirely adult conversation that someone took it upon themselves to erase, and I really would like an explanation. I don't understand the premise on which this thread was deemed worthy of deletion, and I'm really genuinely upset because I was one of the people that asked for answers.
I have disabled JavaScript and tested at least three other popular sex toy websites and none of them use this recursive technology. As far as I can tell, Edenfantasys is the only company among the sex toy depot big rigs that uses this. It's also one that claims to value community, and furthermore, one in which people "speak up" and ask questions and share their concerns. Well, I am concerned. I am concerned about the practice and I am concerned about the deleted post. And I am speaking up for a second time. This is such a blatantly unethical practice that it actually violates Google's webmaster guidelines. It is deceptive and harmful to dozens and dozens of private business endeavors and companies that make Edenfantasys what it is today.
I would really appreciate a response on this: both the post deletion and this coding. Surely we can do this openly and honestly, and of course, with the transparency that Edenfantasys claims to value so much. Thank you very much for reading.
SL&L
