Your take on guns?

Contributor: Darling Jen Darling Jen
I am pretty moderate and in the center on this issue. Maybe because my whole family owns guns (responsibly) and they have been trained to use them in their past or current profession (the military). It was a 'family function' to take a gun safety glass and earn my certification to carry and conceal one, as well. But I don't yet own a gun and possibly never will.

The thing I think is important is that no one is going to take away the second amendment right to bear arms so everyone needs to calm down about that. If we're going to have a real discussion about gun safety, laws, and limitations, we need to take that ridiculous thought off the table. Politicians and news pundits need to just stop fanning a fire of paranoia. I think it would also help to all agree that no matter what side anyone is on, no one wants more violence to happen like in Newton, Connecticut. That was such a horrible event...
01/27/2013
Contributor: kkybf kkybf
i don't care either way
01/27/2013
Contributor: FLIPxMODE FLIPxMODE
dont like em
01/27/2013
Contributor: spiced spiced
I'm pro 2nd amendment, but I'm also for sensible restrictions. Anyone who can pass a background check should be able to own guns if they want to, but nobody needs a 30 round ammo magazine outside the military or law enforcement.

I don't personally know anyone who's prevented a violent crime with their own gun. I used to carry a pistol and had a shotgun at home, but after a good friend seriously injured himself with his handgun, and another friend was traumatized by an accidental shooting death (college kids playing with a semi-auto pistol; my friend was in the next room and heard the shot), I did some research and decided the risks outweighed the benefits. Your experience and opinion may vary--and that's fine.

I get really weary with all the sensationalist rhetoric. Nobody on the pro-gun side wants to see another Newtown; nobody on the pro-regulation side wants to keep law-abiding citizens from having guns if they want to. Let's talk about it, take a vote and then move on.
01/27/2013
Contributor: J5ive J5ive
Gun don't bother me
01/27/2013
Contributor: Avant-garde Avant-garde
Only people who are in the country should be allowed to own pistols and rifles, anything else anywhere else is a solid no by me.
01/27/2013
Contributor: Girly Juice Girly Juice
Canadian here. Don't like guns, don't see the need for regular people to own them, don't think gun ownership is making anyone safer.
01/28/2013
Contributor: richsam richsam
Quote:
Originally posted by "G"
pro 2nd amendment or not? Like current regulations?
i went with the first the first one but i dont on a gun nor will i ever but i do think everyone has the right to own one..crack is illegal but its still everywhere so guess what u make guns ilegal n the ppl who follow the laws wont have them but felon still will so there for making them ilegal dont help anyone
01/28/2013
Contributor: "G" "G"
Quote:
Originally posted by married with children
I dont think that there is a problem with the back ground checks. They are tougher then the ones I have to do to work in schools around kids, or to be a leader in the scouts. They have stopped the wrong people from purchasing firearms, for the most ... more
couldnt agree more!
01/28/2013
Contributor: "G" "G"
I think it is interesting to see that the majority of people that dont like guns admitted that it's because they were ignorant about them. I was raised around firearms and grew up hunting so I have a great respect for them. I think it would be good for more places to offer firearms training courses. For instance my dad had a firing range IN HIS SCHOOL in the 60's, wish that was still an option!
01/28/2013
Contributor: TheirPet TheirPet
I have guns and I don't mind people who have them (we live out in the Wild West) but do we seriously need automatic weapons, assault rifles or extended clips?

I say no.
01/28/2013
Contributor: spiced spiced
Quote:
Originally posted by "G"
I think it is interesting to see that the majority of people that dont like guns admitted that it's because they were ignorant about them. I was raised around firearms and grew up hunting so I have a great respect for them. I think it would be ... more
It would be easy to read too much into the poll answers--because the options are misleading and unclear. The only option for non-gun owners is "don't like guns, don't understand them". It's not even clear whether that means "I don't like guns AND I don't understand them" or "I don't like guns OR I don't understand them."

It's not much better than a poll asking "Have you stopped beating your wife?" and only offering "yes" or "no" as possible answers.

I do agree with you that more firearms safety training would be a good idea. In my opinion, safety training should be mandatory for gun owners.
01/28/2013
Contributor: FunFantasys FunFantasys
Quote:
Originally posted by "G"
pro 2nd amendment or not? Like current regulations?
Im pro 2nd amendment, really we need more monitoring of people's mental states and teaching not banning
01/28/2013
Contributor: Inkkythesquid Inkkythesquid
Love them
01/28/2013
Contributor: Errant Venture Errant Venture
Quote:
Originally posted by spiced
It would be easy to read too much into the poll answers--because the options are misleading and unclear. The only option for non-gun owners is "don't like guns, don't understand them". It's not even clear whether that means ... more
Agreed.
01/29/2013
Contributor: ImaGodiva ImaGodiva
I find the data from other countries interesting, how far fewer people are killed with guns in countries with stricter gun control. My husband is from a country that bans guns and he finds it difficult to understand, why we would take on so much risk to have guns.

I make a point to understand the opposite point of view, but like I said, I find the data interesting.
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by himynameissteph
Yeah, I don't see the point in, well, machine guns. Unnecessary.
Um....who owns machine guns?
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by Living Doll
I don't have any guns. I'm not into them. People who fill their basement with guns kind of weird me out, to be honest.
I believe a great many Americans are not "afraid of them", nor into "filling their basements", but simply want, or need, to have one for self defense. We live in a very increasingly dangerous country and by the time a good, law abiding citizen can call the police and get a response....well, most crimes are long ago "over". A gun is a tool. Pure and simple. Can be used for good or bad. In an honest persons hands, it will never do a bad thing to anyone.
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by RedGlitter
Taking guns away from law-abiding citizens will only make it EASIER for criminals to harm others.

Let's face it; violence, theft, rape and murder happens EVERY DAY in Chicago, and THEY have some pretty strict gun laws!

To think that ... more
Actually, simply overlap a map of the highest and lowest crime rate areas in the USA, and the highest and lowest level of gun ownership. The worst cities for crime have the toughest gun laws. Amazing, all those criminals just don't follow the laws??? Meanwhile, the areas with very high gun ownership have very, very low crime rates. Wonder why that might be? Ever notice these horrific mass shootings happen in places like schools...with a bunch of defenseless, unarmed children? Ever notice how many mass shootings happen at gun shows or NRA conventions? Oh yah...that would be none ever, zero. Why might that be?
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by Bethy Cassatt
I would rather advocate weapons that DON'T destroy your opponent. Like, a taser that paralyzed or pepper spray that worked perfectly. If you shoot a home invader, they're dead, they're never going to pay for what they've done, and ... more
It would be so lovely if that really worked. Ever watch any real police videos where someone is tasered..over and over and over and is still fighting? How about the pepper spray that is like water to some people used to hot chili's, or hits the person using it when the wind shifts.

It would be great to have some viable, reliable non-lethal options to a firearm. When you find one that works, please let us all know. As of now, there "ain't much".
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by Bullfroggy and Rose
Gun laws do not help anything because criminals don't care about the law. Just look at Austrailia they banned almost all guns and bought them from citizens and now more people are murdered with guns than before.
Thank you. The missing voice of logic. That is the whole problem...the criminals could care less what "laws" are in place.
01/29/2013
Contributor: Bignuf Bignuf
Quote:
Originally posted by "G"
This is just silly, if someone knocks your door down with a gun do you really think your pepper spray or taser is gonna save your life? You have some learning to do
Well said.
01/29/2013
Contributor: Gunsmoke Gunsmoke
I don't own a gun - but I fully support gun rights for those who want them. An unarmed population is easily subjugated and intimidated - as the drug lords have done in Mexico.
01/29/2013
Contributor: IvyFayette IvyFayette
Quote:
Originally posted by RavenInChains
First, it isn't against the second ammendment or even anti-gun to support gun control. No one is saying that all guns need to be banned. People are calling for logical restrictions on guns that have worked in every country they've ever been ... more
agree
01/29/2013
Contributor: Lildrummrgurl7 Lildrummrgurl7
I personally do not own a gun or even want to own a gun. I don't see the point in ME having a gun. However, I do think that people should have the right to own a gun if they are properly licensed. Like many have said, criminals don't care about laws, they'll own a gun anyways. Laws don't prevent crimes, they only set punishments for crimes.

I think that something needs to be done to prevent gun crimes. I'm not familiar with the actually restrictions put forth in any new legislation so I can't comment on those. However, an outright ban is not the answer.
01/29/2013
Contributor: RonLee RonLee
Quote:
Originally posted by RavenInChains
First, it isn't against the second ammendment or even anti-gun to support gun control. No one is saying that all guns need to be banned. People are calling for logical restrictions on guns that have worked in every country they've ever been ... more
I respectfully disagree with nearly all of your statements.

So called "logical restrictions" to some are incredibly draconian to others, myself included.

We already have background checks in place for more than fifteen years. Oh and btw for a convicted felon to attempt to purchase a firearm, even after serving his entire sentence, it is another felony. The attempt is a felony in and of itself. Last I was able to find out, none of them have been prosecuted for committing that crime of trying to obtain a firearm that they knew was prohibited to them.

The Department of Homeland Security specifically stated that the AR15 is appropriate for personal defense. I personally agree the AR15 is a very appropriate firearm for home defense. Given its configuration it can also be used as a less than lethal weapon without firing a shot. The Army trained me in that.

The cartridge it fires for home defense is relatively fragile and less likely to penetrate through a wall and injure an innocent. As opposed to what most of the misinformed gun control pundits have been saying the cartridge fired by the AR15 .223 Remington is not high powered. It is much less powerful than a 30-06 hunting round. BTW the AR15 looks like but functions far differently from the military M16, which I have fired extensively. Like I alluded earlier, I'm an Army veteran.
Additionally the military trained me and nearly all of us vets to be proficient and SAFE in the handling of the M16 which from that aspect IS the same as the AR15. So a firearm that I am intimately familiar with should be prohibited to me because it "Looks Scary" or someone "says" it was designed to do something that I would not do with it?
In the hands of every law abiding citizen the AR15 is NOT an assault weapon, it is a DEFENSE rifle.
01/29/2013
Contributor: married with children married with children
Quote:
Originally posted by spiced
I'm pro 2nd amendment, but I'm also for sensible restrictions. Anyone who can pass a background check should be able to own guns if they want to, but nobody needs a 30 round ammo magazine outside the military or law enforcement.

I ... more
I get at least one post a day about how someone used a gun to save their life or the life of someone else. Half the time without firing a shot. I do not know any one personally who has used their firearm to save a life, and I think that is a good thing. Using a firearm is something that most gun owners never want to do. I know I never want to be forced to use mine in self defense, but I will if I have to.
01/29/2013
Contributor: married with children married with children
Quote:
Originally posted by TheirPet
I have guns and I don't mind people who have them (we live out in the Wild West) but do we seriously need automatic weapons, assault rifles or extended clips?

I say no.
once again, we do not have assault weapons per the definition by the DOD. Extended magazines do not make a difference, it only takes a second to change out a magazine.
01/29/2013
Contributor: sillylilkitten sillylilkitten
My bf and I got into some serious arguments about this topic, so I tend to just avoid it and not care. He's ex-military and super pro-gun rights and owns several guns, but I have never needed a gun and understand that we have a serious problem with gun violence in this country and something needed to be done about it a long time ago. I'm pro-regulation, but not caring about any gun bans. I think banning certain guns would be the fastest way to bring down the number of people killed in mass shootings, but I think that a change in gun culture could do it slower, but possibly more effectively over time and without taking away any rights.
01/29/2013
Contributor: xxSuzakuxx xxSuzakuxx
Don't have one or really like them but people have the right to bare arms and i believe if they take that away then they can take away anything(freedom of speech, religion, etc)
01/29/2013