Do you like or dislike Sarah Palin, and why?
Sarah Palin - Like or dislike?
09/15/2011
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
I do not care. At all. However, I do think she's incredibly unintentionally funny. So as an entertainer, she's ok. A politician? Couldn't care less.
09/15/2011
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea.
09/15/2011
I don't care either way.
09/15/2011
Quote:
I don't like her I'll just second P'Gell as my because.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
09/15/2011
Quote:
My thoughts exactly on Palin, makes me wonder why some women still like her?
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
I haven't paid too much attention to Bachman, maybe I should start doing that now.
09/15/2011
Palin COMPLETELY ruined the 'sexy secretary' look forever. Piled up hair and glasses used to be uber sexy ... now it's the Palin Look.
09/15/2011
I disagree with everything that she stands for.
09/15/2011
I'm not a fan - but I must say that the liberal press over reacts when they see someone who violates their rules. Clarence Thomas is black and conservative - so he must be evil - right? Sarah Palin is a woman - but not a democrat - aren't all 'good' women democrats?
They can't wait to destroy the next popular conservative - whether its Sarah or Rick Perry or whoever is next.
It's all about the politics of personal destruction. I doubt that any of us would answer every question correctly when faced with questions designed to make you look bad.
She's no where near as dumb or evil as we've been led to believe. She may or may not ever run again - but you can be sure there are no shortage of journalists out there with their dagger's sharpened.
They can't wait to destroy the next popular conservative - whether its Sarah or Rick Perry or whoever is next.
It's all about the politics of personal destruction. I doubt that any of us would answer every question correctly when faced with questions designed to make you look bad.
She's no where near as dumb or evil as we've been led to believe. She may or may not ever run again - but you can be sure there are no shortage of journalists out there with their dagger's sharpened.
09/15/2011
Quote:
Just my thoughts: A candidate running for VP SHOULD be well-informed on everything he/she'd possibly can. The problem with her is, she doesn't know much of anything, but pretends to be and spills a bunch of crap out of her mouth. Most of the questions the press asked aren't even that complicated, anyone who keeps up with the news can probably figure out a decent answer.
Originally posted by
Gunsmoke
I'm not a fan - but I must say that the liberal press over reacts when they see someone who violates their rules. Clarence Thomas is black and conservative - so he must be evil - right? Sarah Palin is a woman - but not a democrat - aren't all
...
more
I'm not a fan - but I must say that the liberal press over reacts when they see someone who violates their rules. Clarence Thomas is black and conservative - so he must be evil - right? Sarah Palin is a woman - but not a democrat - aren't all 'good' women democrats?
They can't wait to destroy the next popular conservative - whether its Sarah or Rick Perry or whoever is next.
It's all about the politics of personal destruction. I doubt that any of us would answer every question correctly when faced with questions designed to make you look bad.
She's no where near as dumb or evil as we've been led to believe. She may or may not ever run again - but you can be sure there are no shortage of journalists out there with their dagger's sharpened. less
They can't wait to destroy the next popular conservative - whether its Sarah or Rick Perry or whoever is next.
It's all about the politics of personal destruction. I doubt that any of us would answer every question correctly when faced with questions designed to make you look bad.
She's no where near as dumb or evil as we've been led to believe. She may or may not ever run again - but you can be sure there are no shortage of journalists out there with their dagger's sharpened. less
09/15/2011
I'm definitely not a fan. I don't think she's bad as a person, but I wouldn't want someone like that running the country.
09/15/2011
As a person, I like her for her values and staying strong to what she believes in. She doesn't know enough as a whole to really run the country were she to try and become president, but I agree with the beliefs based on knowledge that she does have, I just wish she knew more (was more worldly, basically).
09/15/2011
Quote:
I kind of agree, but we elected a president with zero experience. The Jr. Senator from IL was elected to bring us hope - what happened?
Originally posted by
Rossie
Just my thoughts: A candidate running for VP SHOULD be well-informed on everything he/she'd possibly can. The problem with her is, she doesn't know much of anything, but pretends to be and spills a bunch of crap out of her mouth. Most of
...
more
Just my thoughts: A candidate running for VP SHOULD be well-informed on everything he/she'd possibly can. The problem with her is, she doesn't know much of anything, but pretends to be and spills a bunch of crap out of her mouth. Most of the questions the press asked aren't even that complicated, anyone who keeps up with the news can probably figure out a decent answer.
less
09/15/2011
I'm not American, but we see her on our tv when she is up to her usual tricks. Personally I think she is too weak to be in politics.
09/15/2011
I'm not American either, but she just wants attention, says things for attention, and she's not very intelligent. Not very good traits for a politician.
09/15/2011
i'd like to think she's kind of weak in the head. so no, i don't like her
09/15/2011
Quote:
I just like her. I can't see how she could screw up things in this country any worse then past and present. Dale Quail ring a bell? Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. Clinton had sex in the White House
Originally posted by
Rossie
Do you like or dislike Sarah Palin, and why?
09/17/2011
Quote:
It surprises me the subtitle ways sex-negativity slips in even in place that are supposed to be sex-postive.
Originally posted by
Wildchild
I just like her. I can't see how she could screw up things in this country any worse then past and present. Dale Quail ring a bell? Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of
...
more
I just like her. I can't see how she could screw up things in this country any worse then past and present. Dale Quail ring a bell? Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. Clinton had sex in the White House
less
"Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. Clinton had sex in the White House."
One of those things is not like the other one of those things just doesn't belong. Having "sex in the White House" is not comparable to the other two. Actually "having sex in the White House" doesn't describe anything of what Clinton did wrong actually did wrong i.e. perjure and adultery, it actually describes a perfectly healthy activity that all presidents have engaged in.
Saying "had Sex in the White House" when you actually mean perjury and adultery; is like saying gave speeches when you actually mean lying; signed documents when you actually mean forgery, saying used the computer when you mean hacking etc.
09/17/2011
Quote:
She's ahockey mom that hunts & fish my dream woman.
Originally posted by
Rossie
Do you like or dislike Sarah Palin, and why?
09/17/2011
Like Shellz and Schwaltze, I'm not an American. I have no vested interest in the US beyond their health care system and their foreign policy. From what I've seen of her, I don't like her. She seems quite fake and terribly misinformed.
09/17/2011
I don't agree with 99% of her political rhetoric, but I don't dislike her as a person. I think she's sweet and funny. Even a little ditzy at times. But, I honestly think she loves her family and that's more important than anything else.
09/17/2011
Quote:
I think it's also a pretty safe bet that all presidents have had affairs while in the White House. All of that presumed (completely useless) power must go straight to their cocks.
Originally posted by
namelesschaos
It surprises me the subtitle ways sex-negativity slips in even in place that are supposed to be sex-postive.
"Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. ... more
"Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. ... more
It surprises me the subtitle ways sex-negativity slips in even in place that are supposed to be sex-postive.
"Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. Clinton had sex in the White House."
One of those things is not like the other one of those things just doesn't belong. Having "sex in the White House" is not comparable to the other two. Actually "having sex in the White House" doesn't describe anything of what Clinton did wrong actually did wrong i.e. perjure and adultery, it actually describes a perfectly healthy activity that all presidents have engaged in.
Saying "had Sex in the White House" when you actually mean perjury and adultery; is like saying gave speeches when you actually mean lying; signed documents when you actually mean forgery, saying used the computer when you mean hacking etc. less
"Vice President for The first Bush Admin. couldn't spell "potato". Bush hid during the aftermath of Katrina. Clinton had sex in the White House."
One of those things is not like the other one of those things just doesn't belong. Having "sex in the White House" is not comparable to the other two. Actually "having sex in the White House" doesn't describe anything of what Clinton did wrong actually did wrong i.e. perjure and adultery, it actually describes a perfectly healthy activity that all presidents have engaged in.
Saying "had Sex in the White House" when you actually mean perjury and adultery; is like saying gave speeches when you actually mean lying; signed documents when you actually mean forgery, saying used the computer when you mean hacking etc. less
09/17/2011
I cannot stand her at all!!! There is not one thing she has ever said that I would consider intelligent, or that I agree with. I won't say exactly what I think of her because someone will get mad....
09/17/2011
Quote:
That's preposterous - every president has had affairs in the White House ? What are smoking?
Originally posted by
Ansley
I think it's also a pretty safe bet that all presidents have had affairs while in the White House. All of that presumed (completely useless) power must go straight to their cocks.
09/18/2011
Quote:
There was a period of time in society when affairs were second nature. Women had them, men had them, teenagers had them...it's not at all preposterous. Presidents, kings, congressmen, mayors, police officers, constibles, nobles, knights...all had affairs.
Originally posted by
Gunsmoke
That's preposterous - every president has had affairs in the White House ? What are smoking?
09/18/2011
Quote:
Wow, we are on the same wavelength, P'Gell. Seriously, that bitch is an idiot and really knows what to say to get under my skin.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
09/18/2011
Quote:
I am with P'Gell on this one. No reason to repeat what has already been said so eloquently.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
09/18/2011
Quote:
Pretty much this, with a healthy side dose of she has some pretty dangerous political policies
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang ... more
I think she has the ability to be dangerous, and she is not only misinformed, but has a weak grasp of everything from history, to politics to geography. She's good at selling herself.
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
Now, I feel she's been given enough rope to hang herself. Michelle Bachman is on her way there. Being given enough rope to hang herself. Just let her keep talking and saying stupid racist, classist things. Good. Can't stand her either, and I think she's even more dangerous to our personal freedoms than Palin. Bachman thinks that the recent weather disasters are "punishments from G*d" for letting Obama into the White House. Neither of them believe in the fact of evolution. HOW can someone like run a country that requires rational thought to properly run? I have no idea. less
09/18/2011
In all honesty, I don't like her simply because there is something about the way she carries herself that gives me a bad vibe.
09/18/2011
Quote:
Just because some of each category you mentioned has had affairs does not translate into everyone. Ex. just because some thirteen year olds have had sex does not mean all - or even most have.
Originally posted by
Ansley
There was a period of time in society when affairs were second nature. Women had them, men had them, teenagers had them...it's not at all preposterous. Presidents, kings, congressmen, mayors, police officers, constibles, nobles, knights...all had
...
more
There was a period of time in society when affairs were second nature. Women had them, men had them, teenagers had them...it's not at all preposterous. Presidents, kings, congressmen, mayors, police officers, constibles, nobles, knights...all had affairs.
less
Your generalization is an unfair indictment of everyone. refer you to the Carrie Ann's pole on EF that asks "Does everyone cheat? link. 91% of respondents say no - not everyone cheats.
It is clear from the responses that many people do not and some like me resent the assumption that infidelity is the norm.
09/18/2011