I've heard so much about this and I'm kind of torn. Personally if they had made the cover shot more innocent I wouldn't care at all. Children should not be reading this magazine, they should not be able to look at it, and so if it was not on the cover it should not be an issue at all since the actors are all over 18.

I watched "The Talk" where they were saying how 8 year olds watch Glee. Well..there's a problem right there! Why would anyone ever allow their young child to watch Glee?? There is a lot of sexual based topics on that show, we have people pregnant and hiding who the father was because she slept around, we have a girl who will sleep with just about anyone, another one who does the same just to get attention and love..it's just not a child friendly show! I would never let my young kids watch it and therefore when they see the cover of GQ it won't matter because they don't know who they are.

For teens though..I think the line is somewhat more unclear. Teens do watch Glee and teens shouldn't be hypersexualized either, but aside from the cheesy Lea Michelle shots with the Lollipop I didn't think they were all that untasteful.

I don't particularly love the shoot, I do think it was pretty tacky and it's not my thing at all, but I think it's being blown wayyyy out of proportion!

1. GQ is a magazine for adults.

2. All of the actors involved in the photo shoot are adults.

3. Glee is not a show for children.

4. Like it or not, the school girl theme is a sexual fantasy for some men.

5. Some people need to loosen up their sphincters.

This has been a big-to-do on sever websites I visit on a regular basis. I agree, this shouldn't be an issue because they are over age, but unfortunately, Glee is a show that does target the teenage audience due to a lot of the new and hip songs that they play on there. Whether or not it is meant to be for teens is somewhat of an argument, but it does gear itself towards that age group in some aspects.

Now, do I personally think that this is a big deal... no. I do find it somewhat tasteless but I guess that doesn't matter either. It is a magazine geared towards men. Some men fantasize about the naughty school girl, so with that being said, this picture is perfect for that magazine.

Quite frankly, I DO have a bit of an issue with this shoot. I'm fine with Diana Argon's outfits for the most part, but I think the pictures of Lea Michele are erring on the side of tacky and tasteless. I mean, did she have to be in underwear the entire time? But I can get past that even... EXCEPT for the last picture. Sitting legs spread open while only wearing little white panties that are virtually see-through? No... just no. And the fact that Cory whatshisface is fully clothed and surrounded by two half-naked girls totally portrays women in the wrong way, imho.

Well if it's an adult men's magazine I gotta say they are all tame pics. I wouldn't be busting a nut over those pics anytime soon. Much ado about nothing when there's plenty of MUCH bigger fish to fry elsewhere... next.