I pulled this off their website - Note: The vibration frequency of 80Hz this is the perceived frequency to stimulate the erogenous zones. During the development we have found 80Hz is more responsive in the younger women aged between 18 to 30 years of age whilst the 30+ prefer the Chandra with the increased vibration of 110Hz. link less

Thanks for the link, JT. But, aside from their website, I have read, learned, or seen nothing else that confirms this. Although some women need more stimulation as they get a little older (and that usually doesn't happen until perimenopause, which can start from the mid 30s to the mid 40s, depending on the woman, NOT the same as menopause BTW) a lot of women over 30 or over 40 still have very sensitive clits, and a lot of younger women need power to arrive at climax.


Different women like different types of stimulation (which is why some women can get off on buzzy rabbits or eggs, while others need rumbling deep register massagers and some women need or care more for things in between. I'm not buying the 80Hz thing for "perceived frequency to stimulate erogenous zones" myself.


I just wonder if they are shooting themselves in the foot by making these unproven claims. I see no actual evidence proven data, no P values, nothing but "we have found" which is a way of saying "Here's some bullshit I'm going to feed you." (When I was giving classes on women's health, if we felt something was probably true, (or the director wanted us to present something in a certain way) yet we had no research or definitive data that it was we were told to use the term "many women have found this works for them) so I a more than a bit suspicious.

Thanks for the link, though. Maybe I'll email them and see if there is any real research. less

So, this little finger vibe has made the claim that it is made for "women between the ages of 18 and 30." Does anyone know of any research that would support such a claim?

I know women in their 40s who have very sensitive clitorises, and those in their teens or 20s with "Clits O Steel."

I see no reason to limit the appeal of a vibrator by age, thus the company is excluding a large proportion of the buying public, who for the most part, have a little more disposible income (at least until Bush was done with us, we did.)

Any thoughts on this? It might be a cute little vibe and I included it in an article for EdenCafe I wrote on "Beginner Toys" because it's very intuitive to use. But, not because of the age thing. less

Thanks for the link, JT. But, aside from their website, I have read, learned, or seen nothing else that confirms this. Although some women need more stimulation as they get a little older (and that usually doesn't happen until perimenopause, which can start from the mid 30s to the mid 40s, depending on the woman, NOT the same as menopause BTW) a lot of women over 30 or over 40 still have very sensitive clits, and a lot of younger women need power to arrive at climax.


Different women like different types of stimulation (which is why some women can get off on buzzy rabbits or eggs, while others need rumbling deep register massagers and some women need or care more for things in between. I'm not buying the 80Hz thing for "perceived frequency to stimulate erogenous zones" myself.


I just wonder if they are shooting themselves in the foot by making these unproven claims. I see no actual evidence proven data, no P values, nothing but "we have found" which is a way of saying "Here's some bullshit I'm going to feed you." (When I was giving classes on women's health, if we felt something was probably true, (or the director wanted us to present something in a certain way) yet we had no research or definitive data that it was we were told to use the term "many women have found this works for them) so I a more than a bit suspicious.

Thanks for the link, though. Maybe I'll email them and see if there is any real research. less

So, this little finger vibe has made the claim that it is made for "women between the ages of 18 and 30." Does anyone know of any research that would support such a claim?

I know women in their 40s who have very sensitive clitorises, and those in their teens or 20s with "Clits O Steel."

I see no reason to limit the appeal of a vibrator by age, thus the company is excluding a large proportion of the buying public, who for the most part, have a little more disposible income (at least until Bush was done with us, we did.)

Any thoughts on this? It might be a cute little vibe and I included it in an article for EdenCafe I wrote on "Beginner Toys" because it's very intuitive to use. But, not because of the age thing. less