So, I'm working with a new plastic surgeon doing some web informational videos. His coordinator and I were talking in his office today and she told me about a new way that some medi-spas are giving women G-Shots to the G-Spot. They are injecting Juvederm (an injectable filler usually for lines and wrinkles in the face) into women's g-spots. It supposedly gives the g-spot heightened sensitivity and there is no pain involved in the injection. I was wondering if any of you have heard of this and would this be something any of you would ever consider doing. I'm googling now to find information and articles on it.
The G-Shot Have you heard of this?
07/25/2011
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Oh yeah, I've heard of it. There's no way I'd do it.
07/25/2011
Quote:
I'm reading articles about it now! I'd no idea there was such a thing! I want to find someone thats done it and interview them. Would love to record the process. Pretty wild.
Originally posted by
Ansley
Oh yeah, I've heard of it. There's no way I'd do it.
07/25/2011
07/25/2011
Quote:
I agree.. Please no needles anywhere near there...
Originally posted by
Ansley
Oh yeah, I've heard of it. There's no way I'd do it.
07/26/2011
That's really weird. If for some dumb reason I got this procedure, I'd be afraid to have sex. :/
07/26/2011
mykidsarecrazy
After all the non-pleasurable things that I've been subjected to (speculums, Dr's, nurses, stitches after birth...), I'm thinking a needle inside is something I'd opt out of. If you're going to go that far, one may as well go for total vaginal reconstruction (if you've had more than one child).
07/26/2011
Quote:
I think this is just to plump up the g-spot so it's more sensitive. The vaginal reconstruction is more intense and surgical. I've filmed one before. This is just a shot. My question is, who and why did they ever try this on in the first place to see how it would work! A random shot of Juvederm to the vagina seems weird!
Originally posted by
mykidsarecrazy
After all the non-pleasurable things that I've been subjected to (speculums, Dr's, nurses, stitches after birth...), I'm thinking a needle inside is something I'd opt out of. If you're going to go that far, one may as well go for
...
more
After all the non-pleasurable things that I've been subjected to (speculums, Dr's, nurses, stitches after birth...), I'm thinking a needle inside is something I'd opt out of. If you're going to go that far, one may as well go for total vaginal reconstruction (if you've had more than one child).
less
07/26/2011
For some reason this reminds me of the doctor who would do surgery on women to move their clitorises into the inside of their vaginas. It was a disaster. Usually trying to improve on Nature doesn't get the results a lot of people think. I think Nature has a pretty good system, and unless there is a problem, I don't see using medical solutions to change an otherwise good system. The idea that the woman who doesn't orgasm from plain penis in vagina penetration has "something wrong with her" and expecting a partner to do nothing other than do what works for his own pleasure is a long standing problem (since at least Freud's days) and I think this procedure would only increase that idea in many men who don't want to do the hard work to help their partners orgasm naturally.
I think working to find your G Spot is a good idea. Not everyone has a sensitive G, and if not, (being a nurse) I can't agree that using a medical solution to "fix" something non-medical would be a good idea.
My main fear is that some partners may feel that women "should" be able to always orgasm through penetration alone, and if they don't they need a Medical solution to "fix" what, in reality, isn't broken. Good sex requires more than that for most women, and raising the bar for women ("expecting" us to have orgasms from nothing more than penetration) while lowering the bar for men (so they don't have to learn where the clitoris and the G Spot are and concentrate on their own techniques to help women come) have the liability to create a dangerous and almost competitive sexual environment for women.
If a woman is pre-orgasmic (meaning she has never had an orgasm) then she may need medical help, but that should be centered on her medical issues, hormonal issues, and concentrate on clitoral orgasms first.
If someone wants a G Spot orgasm that badly, I think non-medical ways of going about it are best. JMO.
Mileage and all that.
I think working to find your G Spot is a good idea. Not everyone has a sensitive G, and if not, (being a nurse) I can't agree that using a medical solution to "fix" something non-medical would be a good idea.
My main fear is that some partners may feel that women "should" be able to always orgasm through penetration alone, and if they don't they need a Medical solution to "fix" what, in reality, isn't broken. Good sex requires more than that for most women, and raising the bar for women ("expecting" us to have orgasms from nothing more than penetration) while lowering the bar for men (so they don't have to learn where the clitoris and the G Spot are and concentrate on their own techniques to help women come) have the liability to create a dangerous and almost competitive sexual environment for women.
If a woman is pre-orgasmic (meaning she has never had an orgasm) then she may need medical help, but that should be centered on her medical issues, hormonal issues, and concentrate on clitoral orgasms first.
If someone wants a G Spot orgasm that badly, I think non-medical ways of going about it are best. JMO.
Mileage and all that.
07/26/2011
Quote:
Nicely put P'Gell!
Originally posted by
P'Gell
For some reason this reminds me of the doctor who would do surgery on women to move their clitorises into the inside of their vaginas. It was a disaster. Usually trying to improve on Nature doesn't get the results a lot of people think. I think
...
more
For some reason this reminds me of the doctor who would do surgery on women to move their clitorises into the inside of their vaginas. It was a disaster. Usually trying to improve on Nature doesn't get the results a lot of people think. I think Nature has a pretty good system, and unless there is a problem, I don't see using medical solutions to change an otherwise good system. The idea that the woman who doesn't orgasm from plain penis in vagina penetration has "something wrong with her" and expecting a partner to do nothing other than do what works for his own pleasure is a long standing problem (since at least Freud's days) and I think this procedure would only increase that idea in many men who don't want to do the hard work to help their partners orgasm naturally.
I think working to find your G Spot is a good idea. Not everyone has a sensitive G, and if not, (being a nurse) I can't agree that using a medical solution to "fix" something non-medical would be a good idea.
My main fear is that some partners may feel that women "should" be able to always orgasm through penetration alone, and if they don't they need a Medical solution to "fix" what, in reality, isn't broken. Good sex requires more than that for most women, and raising the bar for women ("expecting" us to have orgasms from nothing more than penetration) while lowering the bar for men (so they don't have to learn where the clitoris and the G Spot are and concentrate on their own techniques to help women come) have the liability to create a dangerous and almost competitive sexual environment for women.
If a woman is pre-orgasmic (meaning she has never had an orgasm) then she may need medical help, but that should be centered on her medical issues, hormonal issues, and concentrate on clitoral orgasms first.
If someone wants a G Spot orgasm that badly, I think non-medical ways of going about it are best. JMO.
Mileage and all that. less
I think working to find your G Spot is a good idea. Not everyone has a sensitive G, and if not, (being a nurse) I can't agree that using a medical solution to "fix" something non-medical would be a good idea.
My main fear is that some partners may feel that women "should" be able to always orgasm through penetration alone, and if they don't they need a Medical solution to "fix" what, in reality, isn't broken. Good sex requires more than that for most women, and raising the bar for women ("expecting" us to have orgasms from nothing more than penetration) while lowering the bar for men (so they don't have to learn where the clitoris and the G Spot are and concentrate on their own techniques to help women come) have the liability to create a dangerous and almost competitive sexual environment for women.
If a woman is pre-orgasmic (meaning she has never had an orgasm) then she may need medical help, but that should be centered on her medical issues, hormonal issues, and concentrate on clitoral orgasms first.
If someone wants a G Spot orgasm that badly, I think non-medical ways of going about it are best. JMO.
Mileage and all that. less
07/26/2011
Wow I've never heard of that and all tho i'd love to have heighthened sensitivity, Im pretty sure there's no way I'd do it!
07/26/2011
Quote:
If I find a doctor that will let me film the procedure, I will post it here with permission. I'm very interested in getting a reaction!
Originally posted by
southern woman
Wow I've never heard of that and all tho i'd love to have heighthened sensitivity, Im pretty sure there's no way I'd do it!
07/26/2011
how would getting a shot in your g-spot not be painful?
07/30/2011
Oh hell no.
08/01/2011
heard about this on a talk show....never would have the nerve to do it!
08/18/2011
Total posts: 15
Unique posters: 10