“Gazing out over the verdant fields of rape, my soul abducted by the strains of scat jazz as they drifted hypnotically through the evening air, I could not help but feel....”
CENSORED.
There is a war taking place on the internet, and I bet you haven’t even noticed.
It’s not a conflict that will affect many of you. Yet. You know how things work these days, though; you give someone an inch, be they lawmakers, politicians, or just big business mavens, and soon they’ll be taking a mile. There’s not a thing any of us can do to stop them, either.
As regular readers will be aware, I write erotica. Nothing too harsh, nothing too extreme; just good old fashioned girl-meets-boy-and-fucks-him smut. No rape, no incest, no toilet games... nothing nasty at all. In fact, the sentence that opens this article could easily have been drawn from one of my tales. However, if I were to publish it on any one of several erotically themed websites, this is how it would be forcibly rendered:
“Gazing out over the verdant fields of censored, my soul censored by the strains of censored jazz as they drifted censored through the evening air, I could not help but feel....”
Who is it making this decision? Well, it’s not the webmaster, and it’s not the law. It’s also not the government. It’s not even some shadowy campaign for the removal of filth from the internet, because I am (for now) still permitted to use words like fuck, shit, cock, cunt, and “oh my god, there’s a seventeen inch fluorescent dildo pumping gallons of jizz up my asshole.” It’s a private business that's making the decision.
Credit card processors (IPSPs, or Internet Payment Service Providers) are the lifeblood of the internet. It is they who collect your money when you make a purchase; they who facilitate your subscriptions to pay sites. They're the ones who ensure your financial security whenever you make a payment of any kind.
They are now in such a position of power that they are arbitrarily censoring the content of the websites that rely upon them to sustain the business in the first place.
With minimal editing, this is an e-mail I received today from the webmaster of one of the sites I contribute to:
“Dear Jenny
This concerns your story called "Welcome To Spain"
Unfortunately, I have been forced by the credit card processor to censor certain subjects. Even simply the use of certain words is now strictly forbidden by the credit card processor censored.
I'm afraid your story is affected by this.
In the actual text of your story: Found 1 occurrence(s) of the word hypnotic
To prevent trouble with censored, your story has been adapted. This means the offending words have been replaced with the text [censored]. I am very sorry about this, but I'm afraid I have no reasonable alternative but to comply with the credit card processor's demands.”
Like I said, this probably doesn’t affect you. Or, if it does, maybe you will shrug and say “okay, I’ll just use another word.” However, that’s not really what it’s about, is it? The four words highlighted in my sentence (and the one that proved so offensive in my story) are words that, in the context used, could not offend anybody. “Rape” and “scat” have negative connotations if you wish to see them in that light. However, what if you represent an agricultural organization or cookery website, and wish to highlight your use of rape seed oil? Or what if your site represents a women’s shelter, or even a news site? What if you’re a jazz critic discussing a very specific style of singing? What if you are musician Scatman John, or actor Scatman Crothers? What if you are a psychiatrist offering hypnosis therapy, or a UFO buff discussing alien abduction?
I’ll tell you what -- you’re screwed.
A decade or so ago, when word filtering was still a new toy for internet providers to play with, America Online made major headlines around the world when they outlawed the use of the word “cunt” (among many others). This was great until the local government in the English town of Scunthorpe found their e-mails being routinely blocked by the filters. Filters, presumably, became smarter thereafter, or at least somebody found a way to prevent similar errors from being perpetuated. Common sense spoke out.
Right now, we have to hope that similar lightning will strike again, and that common sense will prevail once more.
Because it’s not the language that is under assault; it’s not erotica, it’s not one person’s right to write smut and call it art. It is free speech. It is creativity. It is the First Amendment, for heaven’s sake. The Supreme Court could not dislodge an author’s right to write, neither could the government, the FBI, or any other legal body in the land. A lot of people fought, were imprisoned and even died to preserve the right of free expression. Perhaps we were naive, but a lot of us thought they had won the war.
Think again. A private company, one of the largest IPSPs on the entire internet, with offices and representation throughout the United States and Europe, has stepped in where politics, religion, and all the other forces of censorship could not, and snatched away that right regardless.
EdenFantasys does not use the IPSP I’m referring to here. So, for the moment, we can continue writing about mesmeric jazz vocalists who steal our souls. We can discuss our favorite 1994 episode of Dr Quinn, Medicine Woman, and our favorite song from Fleetwood Mac’s Mystery To Me CD. We can even post photographs of those beautiful fields of bright yellow that adorn the French countryside between Paris and the Loire.
However, a lot of websites cannot, because someone, somewhere, has declared that the use of certain words to be prohibited. These words are not, incidentally, posted on the company’s website, so you can’t even watch what you say ahead of time. Verboten. "Interdite." Or, as George Orwell would have put it in 1984, they are now "unwords."
Forget about Big Brother; it looks like Big Business is who we really need to watch out for.
CENSORED.
There is a war taking place on the internet, and I bet you haven’t even noticed.
It’s not a conflict that will affect many of you. Yet. You know how things work these days, though; you give someone an inch, be they lawmakers, politicians, or just big business mavens, and soon they’ll be taking a mile. There’s not a thing any of us can do to stop them, either.
As regular readers will be aware, I write erotica. Nothing too harsh, nothing too extreme; just good old fashioned girl-meets-boy-and-fucks-him smut. No rape, no incest, no toilet games... nothing nasty at all. In fact, the sentence that opens this article could easily have been drawn from one of my tales. However, if I were to publish it on any one of several erotically themed websites, this is how it would be forcibly rendered:
“Gazing out over the verdant fields of censored, my soul censored by the strains of censored jazz as they drifted censored through the evening air, I could not help but feel....”
Who is it making this decision? Well, it’s not the webmaster, and it’s not the law. It’s also not the government. It’s not even some shadowy campaign for the removal of filth from the internet, because I am (for now) still permitted to use words like fuck, shit, cock, cunt, and “oh my god, there’s a seventeen inch fluorescent dildo pumping gallons of jizz up my asshole.” It’s a private business that's making the decision.
Credit card processors (IPSPs, or Internet Payment Service Providers) are the lifeblood of the internet. It is they who collect your money when you make a purchase; they who facilitate your subscriptions to pay sites. They're the ones who ensure your financial security whenever you make a payment of any kind.
They are now in such a position of power that they are arbitrarily censoring the content of the websites that rely upon them to sustain the business in the first place.
With minimal editing, this is an e-mail I received today from the webmaster of one of the sites I contribute to:
“Dear Jenny
This concerns your story called "Welcome To Spain"
Unfortunately, I have been forced by the credit card processor to censor certain subjects. Even simply the use of certain words is now strictly forbidden by the credit card processor censored.
I'm afraid your story is affected by this.
In the actual text of your story: Found 1 occurrence(s) of the word hypnotic
To prevent trouble with censored, your story has been adapted. This means the offending words have been replaced with the text [censored]. I am very sorry about this, but I'm afraid I have no reasonable alternative but to comply with the credit card processor's demands.”
Like I said, this probably doesn’t affect you. Or, if it does, maybe you will shrug and say “okay, I’ll just use another word.” However, that’s not really what it’s about, is it? The four words highlighted in my sentence (and the one that proved so offensive in my story) are words that, in the context used, could not offend anybody. “Rape” and “scat” have negative connotations if you wish to see them in that light. However, what if you represent an agricultural organization or cookery website, and wish to highlight your use of rape seed oil? Or what if your site represents a women’s shelter, or even a news site? What if you’re a jazz critic discussing a very specific style of singing? What if you are musician Scatman John, or actor Scatman Crothers? What if you are a psychiatrist offering hypnosis therapy, or a UFO buff discussing alien abduction?
I’ll tell you what -- you’re screwed.
A decade or so ago, when word filtering was still a new toy for internet providers to play with, America Online made major headlines around the world when they outlawed the use of the word “cunt” (among many others). This was great until the local government in the English town of Scunthorpe found their e-mails being routinely blocked by the filters. Filters, presumably, became smarter thereafter, or at least somebody found a way to prevent similar errors from being perpetuated. Common sense spoke out.
Right now, we have to hope that similar lightning will strike again, and that common sense will prevail once more.
Because it’s not the language that is under assault; it’s not erotica, it’s not one person’s right to write smut and call it art. It is free speech. It is creativity. It is the First Amendment, for heaven’s sake. The Supreme Court could not dislodge an author’s right to write, neither could the government, the FBI, or any other legal body in the land. A lot of people fought, were imprisoned and even died to preserve the right of free expression. Perhaps we were naive, but a lot of us thought they had won the war.
Think again. A private company, one of the largest IPSPs on the entire internet, with offices and representation throughout the United States and Europe, has stepped in where politics, religion, and all the other forces of censorship could not, and snatched away that right regardless.
EdenFantasys does not use the IPSP I’m referring to here. So, for the moment, we can continue writing about mesmeric jazz vocalists who steal our souls. We can discuss our favorite 1994 episode of Dr Quinn, Medicine Woman, and our favorite song from Fleetwood Mac’s Mystery To Me CD. We can even post photographs of those beautiful fields of bright yellow that adorn the French countryside between Paris and the Loire.
However, a lot of websites cannot, because someone, somewhere, has declared that the use of certain words to be prohibited. These words are not, incidentally, posted on the company’s website, so you can’t even watch what you say ahead of time. Verboten. "Interdite." Or, as George Orwell would have put it in 1984, they are now "unwords."
Forget about Big Brother; it looks like Big Business is who we really need to watch out for.
I got the same email from the same website.
The weirdest one to me was that "celebrity" was censored from a couple of my stories. And one story, with a large part set in a hospital, reads weirdly since every use of the word "drug" was censored.
As you say, the big worry is not that I can't put the word "rape" in an erotic story (I don't write stories about rape anyway). It is where the slippery slope ends.
I've just received a more complete list of "banned" words. Again, you will notice that no actual vulgarities are included, but there's a lot of very innocent terms whose sexual connotations, while conceivably negative, are almost extraordinarily minimal. Okay, deep breath (you'll need it)...
rape (and variations... raped, raping etc)
scat / skat (and variations... scatology, scatalogical etc)
be[a]stiality
incest/incestuous
abduct (and variations)
kidnap (and variations - so there goes any attempt to dicuss Robert Louis Stevenson's second best-loved novel)
Lolita (ditto Vladimir Nabokov's best-loved book)
hypnotic, hypnosis, hypnotize, hypnotherapy... in fact, any word beginning with hypno-...,
drugs
celebrities (and variations/abbreviations thereof)
other terms... necrophilia, pedophilia (and associations - underage, pre-teen etc), zoophilia... fall into illegal territory, so their presence on the list could be considered understandable. At the same time as they bightly highlight another iniquity of this regime, the absolute absence of any human agency in actually checking the context of these words' usage. If you are going to police the Internet, then police it properly.
Right now, the companies employing this system are essentially practicing the linguistic equivalent of racial profiling... the assumption that all uses of a given word are illegal, just because a small handful of them might be.
And it's only going to get worse.
Paul - "celebrity" completely baffles me... well, a lot of the words on the list do so, but that one in particular because I cannot even think what purpose it serves. There is a market for so-called celebrity-porn, but that just goes ahead and uses actual names. As for drugs - I guess there'll be a few less authors singing the praises of Viagra and associated medicines; and more librarians being careful about what they get up to in the classic literature section.
Oh and I just realized - the Christian Dior perfume I bought for a friend's birthday gift... half banned. "Hypnotic" is out, but "Poison" is still allowed.
I have to agree on this one, it has become absolutely ridiculous. A company should not be able to censor the internet in any way, shape, or form, especially if said company exists within the confines of the United States or Otherwise. Where's a petition to ban this sort of behavior?
Me again... I just heard from a different webmaster who published a list of the banned words as a warning to potential contributors. DO NOT USE THESE TERMS. Guess what? The company flagged them all, and he has to take them down.
So, we have a set of rules which, if you break them, you are in breach of the company's regulations. And if you tell contributors what the rules are to make sure they don't break them... you are in breach of the company's regulations.
The sad part is that a completely innocent story could have some if not all those words in them. I once encountered something similar on a site that did not allow content that adult of nature. Some idiots took it upon themselves to create a program that could scan stories to detect "offending terms" and then those stories were flagged and removed without ever a person having read them. The end result was a lot of back lash against the people who created and were using the program and the actual site. Oh course it also took people writing G rated stories about a Pussy (cat) and Cocks (male chicken) and the use other "crude" terms in more creative ways while others wrote completely x-rated stories using terms that wouldn't be flagged. Oh the fun times had there during that time.
I would like to add something that I didn't touch on, because I hit the post button by accident..lol
When ever I see a company that deals with the public, be it a pharmacy that refuses to have Plan B to a book store that refuses to stock a book because it's owner is offended or it goes against their religious or moral beliefs, I always wanna smack them up side the head and yell "Why then did you decide to go into that type of buisness? Why should another persons religious and moral beliefs result in something being restricted to me. Don't like Plan B...don't use it. Don't like smut...don't read or watch it. Quite a simple thing really.
Well this is plain disturbing. I think the phrase, "I don't want to live on this planet anymore." Is applicable. Very much so...
Um.. so what can be done to combat this?
Could you share which company this is? I'd like to boycott them. I strongly believe THAT is how we beat bullshit like this.
The name of this private company, one of the largest IPSPs on the entire internet needs to be revealed so that internet retailers can change to a company that will meet their needs. And this information needs to flood the internet so that everyone becomes aware of their unethical practice. In so doing, the company will either change or lose so much business that they will go under due to their foolish business tactics.
I have never heard about this issue. If this company is heading in the direction as you said, they need to be cut off at the pass. Thanks for the information.