Quote:
Originally posted by
Airen Wolf
The foreskin looses the adhesive tissues long before a male starts to worry about orgasm. This isn't really an issue for an uncircumsized male.
Besides the foreskin is just a slip of skin that covers the glans it isn't blocked...the boy
...
more
The foreskin looses the adhesive tissues long before a male starts to worry about orgasm. This isn't really an issue for an uncircumsized male.
Besides the foreskin is just a slip of skin that covers the glans it isn't blocked...the boy has to pee afterall. So ya it's a myth, according to Arch he was able to pull back his foreskin long before he actually experienced his first orgasm.
less
I was just going to say what you did.
Most male children in their natural state (with the foreskin the Good Lord gave them) find it will separate from the glans somewhere between toddlerhood and early adolescence, usually earlier rather than later. There is always a hole, because as you said, Airen, they have to pee from before birth! The foreskin also stretches enough to cover an erection, so it has nothing to do with orgasm or ejaculation.
Phimosis (where scar tissue causes a part of the foreskin to adhere to the glans) is rare and usually the result of a botched circumcision. Or the result of someone tearing the protective seal from a baby boy's foreskin away prematurely by retracting it. Everyone should know that an infant's foreskin should
never be retracted for any reason. It will eventually retract on its own, usually with help from the little boy himself, on his own time.
The foreskin of an infant is held with the same amount of force that holds your finger nail to your nail bed. Imagine ripping that off! That's what is done during force-able retraction and/or circumcision. Ripping that away for any reason is brutality.
