Ok a poorly worded sentence brought this up in a different thread. One of my biggest pet peeves is people (in the US) who believe that the MPAA ratings (G, PG PG-13, R, NC-17) or the equivalent in other US industries: ESRB for video games, parental discretion sticker for music etc are somehow legally enforceable by the government. All of these systems are entirely voluntary and ironically where set up to avoid government regulation.
They also can’t be legally enforced it would be massively unconstitutional. It would be a violation of first amendment free speech protections on multiple grounds and it would be an unlawful delegation of legislative power to a private industry organization. Before someone asks “Porn” on the other hand falls under obscenities laws, a determination made by courts not a private industry group, which is why that can be legally enforced but MPAA rating can’t. Other countries have different systems and different laws of course.
This myth annoys me a lot so did you believe in it or did you know of the voluntary nature of these rating.
They also can’t be legally enforced it would be massively unconstitutional. It would be a violation of first amendment free speech protections on multiple grounds and it would be an unlawful delegation of legislative power to a private industry organization. Before someone asks “Porn” on the other hand falls under obscenities laws, a determination made by courts not a private industry group, which is why that can be legally enforced but MPAA rating can’t. Other countries have different systems and different laws of course.
This myth annoys me a lot so did you believe in it or did you know of the voluntary nature of these rating.