If they were only a porn star - who just decided to run for office, no. If they were qualified for the job, and also did porn, yes.

At this point, I think it's more damaging to their political aspirations to have had a career as a banker.

never

If they were qualified, then yes. I would do everything I could to support their campaign.

However, if they were qualified but received little support from the rest of the nation, and it was a close tie between different terrible candidate and different adequate one, I would vote for the adequate one. Why waste my vote on someone who has no chance, when so much is at stake?

A lot of peoples' thinking is like mine, and I worry that few boundaries will ever be broken because of it. People perhaps shouldn't keep voting because of what they think is popular opinion, but instead vote for who they think is the best candidate. What do you guys think about that? How much should we let what we think is popular opinion influence our votes? Does this thinking hurt in the long run, or are we really just being practical?

(Sorry if this doesn't make much since or is off-topic. Sleepy.)

If they had the qualifications and experience working in politics, I don't care about being a porn star. It's not something that says lack of ethics.