Monogamy is unnatural, religions was what made us believe that we must stay monogamous.
Do you believe that monogamy is natural or unnatural for humans?
08/06/2012
There are plenty of animals (like birds) that are monogamous...
08/06/2012
other it is unnatural in a primitive way but because of our modern moral standards it is expected. so over time is becoming natural. If we still went with our primitive nature rape would not exist it would just be natural reproduction of a male over a female but over time we have evolved. So I said other because of the many factors involved.
08/06/2012
I really think it just depends on the person. Some are meant for monogamy while others are not. My family members were always monogamous but I personally lean towards polyamory. I thought I was just a cheater but I now realize that I simply need more and here is nothing wrong ith that as long as the person or people that you are with feel the same way.
08/06/2012
As animals we're all supposed to hook up with each other to continue life and stuff. But we have more intelligence which gives us the opportunity to be mono.
08/18/2012
I think that both monogamy and polyamory can be natural, for different people. I think as long as romantic partners have clear and honest discussion about their intentions for the relationship, neither of these will necessarily result in cheating or hurt feelings.
08/20/2012
I think it's natural.
08/20/2012
I think so, we all feel an innate jealousy about things and do have a hoard mentality.
08/20/2012
I think monogamy is natural to humans.
08/20/2012
Quote:
I opted for other, because an imperfection is our design we are naturally drawn to polygamy. But a person who is raised and trained in an environment that promotes and rewards monogamy can be naturally drawn to that sensation. There are many unknowns that will factor into this answer.
Originally posted by
Tori Rebel
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are
...
more
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are animals, why should we be wired differently in that capacity.
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
08/20/2012
Biologically, I think monogamy is unnatural for humans, but it's societal pressures, and some are more inclined to monogamy than others.
08/20/2012
Quote:
not going there
Originally posted by
Tori Rebel
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are
...
more
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are animals, why should we be wired differently in that capacity.
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
08/20/2012
Quote:
I forget the author but there is a book that discusses this froma socialogical and biological point of view called the myth of monogamy, very interesting read
Originally posted by
Tori Rebel
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are
...
more
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are animals, why should we be wired differently in that capacity.
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
08/26/2012
Quote:
You can still love your spouse and be sexually attracted to others. Its not an exclusive thing.
Originally posted by
David88
Being a Christian I have to vote other. I think in our nature we want as much as we possibly can and that includes polygamy. I think it is out of love for our spouse or religious reasons that we don't take part in it.
09/05/2012
I see a lot of talk about either monogamy or polyamory "feeling" natural. However, it is possible for very unnatural things to feel natural. This is what makes culture possible. The fact is that much of your behavior and feelings are socially encoded in a way that may be indistinguishable from instinct. This includes romantic and sexual behaviors.
I suppose what I'm getting at is the "is it natural?" question is very silly to be asked of human behavior. Just let people be when they're not hurting anyone.
I suppose what I'm getting at is the "is it natural?" question is very silly to be asked of human behavior. Just let people be when they're not hurting anyone.
09/05/2012
I think both lifestyles are natural. I read an article that said that our society used to be mostly poly, but has now moved to mostly mono due to government influence. It was easier to control people if they weren't in such large romantic groups. Particularly when war was involved.
I wish we all could co-exist peacefully, but we know that's not happening anytime soon. The best we can do is educate each other.
I wish we all could co-exist peacefully, but we know that's not happening anytime soon. The best we can do is educate each other.
09/07/2012
My answer is fairly simple: monogamy and polygamy both occur in humans. From that, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to ascertain that BOTH monogamy and polygamy are "natural" across the human species. This is especially true if you consider socialization a part of "naturalness," which makes perfect sense because we don't isolate genetic and social causes when talking about "natural behavior" in non-human primates.
09/07/2012
I dont really see either as unnatural, i think different people feel differently about it. I suppose animals share partners more but I dont see anything unnatural about having one partner. A lot of people consider it safe and fun and get all their needs met that way.
09/16/2012
After studying the science behind human sexuality I would say monogamy is unnatural.
But if it works for you have at it, I just know I prefer to have more options =3
But if it works for you have at it, I just know I prefer to have more options =3
09/16/2012
monogamy makes sense for certain times in life. but always? no way. which is why some people let their ingrained notions leading them to serial monogamy or cheating
09/19/2012
Quote:
All depends on the humans.
Originally posted by
Tori Rebel
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are
...
more
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are animals, why should we be wired differently in that capacity.
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
09/20/2012
Quote:
I believe that commitment is natural for humans. That we are meant to bond with our mates. But that that dose not necessarily mean monogamy.
Originally posted by
Tori Rebel
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are
...
more
There have been studies done and there is a large population of people who do not believe that monogamy is a natural function for humans. One of the most popular reasons given is that you very rarely see monogamy in nature and since humans are animals, why should we be wired differently in that capacity.
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
One of the most popular arguments is that humans are not just your typical animals, roaming about in a field or a jungle - that we function at a higher level (this could also be compared to Freud's id/ego/superego structure).
So what do you think? Were humans made to try and procreate as much as possible or are we designed for monogamy? less
10/14/2012
I really don't know. I lean more towards yes. There are a lot of monogamous animals, and it's in human nature to be jealous creatures. The polyamorous person I know has issues with jealousy all the time in their relationships and the people I've seen shows about have the same problem. It's easier not to have to deal with it.
10/14/2012
Monogamy is an unnatural behavior for humans
10/14/2012
I don't know but I do know that love conquers temptation...if you want it to
10/14/2012
Monogamy for me! I can't think of anyone else I would want to be with!
10/18/2012
It's natural for me, but I get a lot with my husband!
11/29/2012
People and their personalities are to different to categorize like this. For some its natural, and for others it's unnatural.
01/12/2013
I guess it's cool if other people want monogamy; however, it is NOT for me...
01/22/2013
I voted "other" because humans are weird. We're one of the few animals that can consciously override our natural impulses on a grand scale (a society level), and we're also social creatures.
I don't think there's a "natural" state for humans unless you consider having sex with anything that moves "natural". Because, seriously, I think it's pretty safe to say that humans will have sex with anything that moves. And a lot of things that don't.
I don't think there's a "natural" state for humans unless you consider having sex with anything that moves "natural". Because, seriously, I think it's pretty safe to say that humans will have sex with anything that moves. And a lot of things that don't.
02/13/2013