Peter Licker is NOT slicker

This product is not in the least bit exciting. The thought that it would make oral a little tasty is nice but like I said I was disappointed by the flavor and texture.

Published: October 21, 2010

Pros

I really cannot think of any pros here

Cons

The flavor can be improved as well as the consistency.

Rating by reviewer:

somewhat useful review

Use

The best use of this product is for oral sex. I think it will work on males as well as females. The best occasion is foreplay. There are no concerns. I don't think there are any allergy concerns here. Precautions are that it can make things a little sticky.

Who / How / What
[ ? ]
Who might this product be best for? How is it best used? What are the best circumstances or situations for using this product?
- Foreplay
- Mood enhancer
Where
[ ? ]
Where / what types of places can this product be used?
- Anywhere
Body / part areas
[ ? ]
What areas on the body can this product be used / what areas does it stimulate best?
- Oral

Texture / Consistency / Thickness / Viscosity

The texture is silky but I thought the consistency would be thicker more like a cream. It is really too runny. It is sticky as well. The banana flavor is not good either.

- Slick
- Sticky
- Thin

Taste / Aroma

I did not like the taste at all. The smell is ok however the aroma is inviting and nice. It does not remind me of any other scents maybe banana pudding.

- Bad taste
- Smells good
- Strong taste

Performance

The product did not last long at all and it was kind of hard to clean up as it is really sticky. I did not personally like this product I was disappointed really. The best thing I think is maybe the smell and the name.