I am a young, working-class, mid-western, feminist, liberal queer who is about a 4.5 on the Kinsey scale. When people ask me if I’m “for gay marriage,” I hesitate and groan a yes. Depending on who is asking, people are generally surprised.
“But what about visitation rights?”
“It’s a civil right!”
“Aren’t you gay?”
Then I get the leftist who responds, “Yeah I think marriage is a broken institution and should be abolished!”
None of these responses actually represent my view on queer marriages, although I find them each very valid in their own way. I think hospital visitation rights and parenthood rights are crucial. I think that it is a civil right. I am gay, and I don't want people to think that I'm abandoning my identity to side with conservatives--I am not against gay marriage in any way. I think queer marriages that exist now and that will in the future are beautiful relationships, and I wish all the married queers absolute happiness and equal rights. However, I also think that there are more important issues that we as a queer community need to work on. We need to insure queer people, who are disproportionately without health insurance. We need to get homeless queer youth off the street and into loving homes that support and love them. We need to educate young people about queerness. We need to focus on youth and the working and lower classes, not two people with their lives together who want to take the next step to marriage.
How I see it, and of course this is not always the case, when we fight working-class and low-income battles, middle and upper class battles become obsolete, or no longer necessary. The trickle down effect won't work. When marriage equality happens, the mainstream queer movement will have the attitude that we won, and there is nothing else to fight for when that could not be further from the truth. Those without voices in the mainstream queer movement will still not have voices, and their needs will not have been met. If there are no more homeless queer youth, there will almost definitely be queer marriage. If there are no more transgender 20-somethings who are forced into street sex work where they are frequently robbed or raped because they cannot get a “regular” job or can’t acquire more expensive clients in a safe environment, there will most definitely be queer marriage. If there are no more 16-year-old lesbians being sexually assaulted and raped because their cismale “best friend” wants to “fix” them, there will most definitely be queer marriage.
As a minority, queer people have to band together and organize. Without the working-class and low-income people, queer movements don’t have a chance. Every successful revolution has engaged the working-class. Why has the queer movement chosen not to? Why is there such a focus on issues for those who have no other equality problems to fight for that are relevant to their daily lives, because they live in San Francisco and work at the Human Rights Campaign? Why are fundraisers for queer organizations $150 for a plate of food when a large population of the queer movement can never afford that? We as queers need to ask ourselves why the most privileged queer people are the only ones at the table.
As a working-class queer, the gay marriage movement doesn’t represent me, and it doesn’t represent most other queers I know. Whether or not I choose to get married eventually when my class problems are eliminated is irrelevant when today, I'm not sure how to pay my bills or get proper health insurance. Beyond that, it doesn’t fulfill my duty in life to help those who have less than me. Activism isn’t about helping those who already have the most of anyone else in a given community. It’s about reaching down to mobilize those with less, ask them what they need the most, and fight with them until their life is as good as yours.
“But what about visitation rights?”
“It’s a civil right!”
“Aren’t you gay?”
Then I get the leftist who responds, “Yeah I think marriage is a broken institution and should be abolished!”
None of these responses actually represent my view on queer marriages, although I find them each very valid in their own way. I think hospital visitation rights and parenthood rights are crucial. I think that it is a civil right. I am gay, and I don't want people to think that I'm abandoning my identity to side with conservatives--I am not against gay marriage in any way. I think queer marriages that exist now and that will in the future are beautiful relationships, and I wish all the married queers absolute happiness and equal rights. However, I also think that there are more important issues that we as a queer community need to work on. We need to insure queer people, who are disproportionately without health insurance. We need to get homeless queer youth off the street and into loving homes that support and love them. We need to educate young people about queerness. We need to focus on youth and the working and lower classes, not two people with their lives together who want to take the next step to marriage.
How I see it, and of course this is not always the case, when we fight working-class and low-income battles, middle and upper class battles become obsolete, or no longer necessary. The trickle down effect won't work. When marriage equality happens, the mainstream queer movement will have the attitude that we won, and there is nothing else to fight for when that could not be further from the truth. Those without voices in the mainstream queer movement will still not have voices, and their needs will not have been met. If there are no more homeless queer youth, there will almost definitely be queer marriage. If there are no more transgender 20-somethings who are forced into street sex work where they are frequently robbed or raped because they cannot get a “regular” job or can’t acquire more expensive clients in a safe environment, there will most definitely be queer marriage. If there are no more 16-year-old lesbians being sexually assaulted and raped because their cismale “best friend” wants to “fix” them, there will most definitely be queer marriage.
As a minority, queer people have to band together and organize. Without the working-class and low-income people, queer movements don’t have a chance. Every successful revolution has engaged the working-class. Why has the queer movement chosen not to? Why is there such a focus on issues for those who have no other equality problems to fight for that are relevant to their daily lives, because they live in San Francisco and work at the Human Rights Campaign? Why are fundraisers for queer organizations $150 for a plate of food when a large population of the queer movement can never afford that? We as queers need to ask ourselves why the most privileged queer people are the only ones at the table.
As a working-class queer, the gay marriage movement doesn’t represent me, and it doesn’t represent most other queers I know. Whether or not I choose to get married eventually when my class problems are eliminated is irrelevant when today, I'm not sure how to pay my bills or get proper health insurance. Beyond that, it doesn’t fulfill my duty in life to help those who have less than me. Activism isn’t about helping those who already have the most of anyone else in a given community. It’s about reaching down to mobilize those with less, ask them what they need the most, and fight with them until their life is as good as yours.
Nice article. I feel a little all over the place about the points you've made here, so if this is a little disjointed, I apologize. Personally, I think gay marriage IS a working class issue. The argument that you use that the queer community needs all these other things first is a little counter-intuitive to me. Some of the things that you point out as wrong (i.e. cismales raping lesbians) are things that are already addressed, albeit there are systemic issues with those systems as well (such as the hoops we have to jump through to prove sexual violence, which leads to under reporting because we'd rather not be victimized again by the system that's supposed to protect us or the healthcare system that profits from people's illness and that would allow anyone to go without adequate care). I just think it's really difficult to say that we shouldn't work on gay marriage until we work on the way people are raising their children. I don't see why this change shouldn't be concurrent.
On a practical note, if gay marriage were legal, companies could no longer decide whether they wanted their insurance benefits to cover same-sex partners, thus lowering the number of uninsured queer people. Obviously this still doesn't address every queer person, and again, I think healthcare reform is also necessary, because everyone should have access to healthcare.
I speak about these issues as someone who just has spent most of my life as a working class person. I know the issues I've had as a queer person from not being able to marry. Marriage is not a one size fits all solution, and if it's not something that speaks to you, that's totally fine. But marriage equality is not just an issue for queer people with money, it's something that's very important to a lot of us for many different reasons. It's not everything, but it is one piece of the equation toward a more equitable standard of living for all people. To quote someone I really admire, Audre Lorde, "There is no such thing as a single-issue struggle because we do not live single-issue lives." I really enjoyed your piece though, thanks for writing.
I have friends that will be getting married to the same sex and they r happy and im happy for them!!!!
Thanks for the critique and comments!
Amen to this!
Amen! I totally agree
Great article.