I think Hymenal Pussy Palm Pal would have been a perfect name for it.

That's what it is.

Being tight is entirely not relevant, so that's out. I think calling it what it is, and that it is clearly not actually that sexy, highlights how stupid fetishizing it and "virginity" really is.

I would like to know how the men who are into that type of thing feel about this toy, as it is not a one-use toy, and is therefore no longer actually virginal after the first use. Does it then get tossed out for being used up and slutty or impure? less

I get that this is somewhat of a novelty item but I'm still not too keen on the fetishizing of the hymen as it relates to heterosexual notions of "virginity". A toy that comes with a penetrable membrane in the vaginal canal then definitively refers to itself as a virgin pussy is just feeding into a damaging myth. "Virginity" is a flawed enough concept on its own but the social pressures associated with the hymen and virginity simply aren't the kind of thing I want to see reflected in a sex toy.

I have no problem with the concept of the toy, just its name. Couldn't they have chosen a name that didn't have such a misguided, puritanical connotation, like "Tight Pussy Palm Pal" or "Hymenal Pussy Palm Pal"? ...Okay, "Hymenal Pussy Palm Pal" is not very sexy. But perpetuating heteronormative expectations isn't very sexy either! less