The New Intimacy

Do you find it offensive?

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: Forum Moderator Forum Moderator
As it stands, until we speak with the author we do not know what their intent is and this post is speculative at best.

If someone would please send an onsite message with a link to the review, that would be most helpful. Thank you!
04/13/2012
Contributor: Bethy Cassatt Bethy Cassatt
I think they just meant vaginal depth.
04/13/2012
Contributor: Thomas90 Thomas90
... i think she's referring to the "loose"ness of the vagina?
04/13/2012
Contributor: ScottA ScottA
Even if it's vagina size there are better ways to put it, because even those who use and enjoy bigger toys can enjoy smaller toys. Why not say "those who like bigger toys?"
04/13/2012
Contributor: Femme Mystique Femme Mystique
I didn't think about this in terms of body size either. I can see how you would interpret it that way though, it's a little confusing.
04/13/2012
Contributor: Melan!e Melan!e
I could see how that might be offensive but it could just be bad wording and the author didn't actually mean "bigger girls" in that sense.
It should probably get edited though since that probably isn't the best way to explain the size of a vibrator in a review.
04/13/2012
Contributor: mat mat
If it was about weight, it was certainly f*cked up.
04/13/2012
Contributor: Hekate101 Hekate101
Quote:
Originally posted by Ansley
I think the term the person was looking for is "size queens". And it was simply misworded.
Agreed. I hope.
04/13/2012
Contributor: Bex1331 Bex1331
I just read it as girls with bigger vaginas
04/14/2012
Contributor: Tangles Tangles
It would depend on the context I would think. If making the assumption that bigger girls all like bigger toys, than yes, that's pretty offensive.
04/14/2012
Contributor: charletnarouh charletnarouh
I agree, I would read that as vagina "size" or tightness. It's poorly worded, to be sure. But I hope that this individual is not so deluded or poorly informed to believe that a person's weight has anything to do with what size toys they like. It's more likely, in my opinion, that they just made a bad choice of words. I'm choosing to give them the benefit of the doubt that is the case, but I second the suggestion to message the writer of the review and suggest a word change. If you message them, though, I would recommend doing so with the same benefit of doubt, as in, "This reads like you're saying women who have overall larger bodies or are heavier when I think you mean to say women who have tighter or smaller vaginas."
04/16/2012
Contributor: SweetD64 SweetD64
Quote:
Originally posted by Raigne
I didn't immediately think body size. In that context that sounds more to me like it's referring to tightness.
I would have to agree. I did not think of body size.
04/16/2012
Contributor: Breas Breas
I've read this in a couple reviews in the past. I usually mention something. I'm never really offended but I figured that it'd be best to let the person know that way they don't end up looking silly.
04/16/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Either body size or the myth of "tight vs 'loose' vaginas" is ill advised way to talk about people.

Women who enjoy large toys DO NOT have "loose" vaginas!!!! Why is everyone so hung up on body size, this was obviously either a misunderstanding of dildo size preference, or a misunderstanding that only "large" women have "loose vaginas." Both are untrue, as I said before every woman has the sides of her vagina touching while at rest.

There is no such thing as a 'loose vagina." Some women simply prefer large toys or large anything else, and their vaginas spring right back to sides touching when they are don't stay stretched.

Do people who occasionally take a large poop have "permanently stretched" and large anuses?] Of course not. Do people who take large bites of food have "permanently stretched" mouths?

Same thing.
04/16/2012