Quote:
Originally posted by
Lena Eden
My dearest community!
I’m happy to announce that we’re going to bring some updates to our Review Program.
Let’s talk about Review Templates for Sex Toys.
We’d like to try and make the reviews even more interesting, exciting,
...
more
My dearest community!
I’m happy to announce that we’re going to bring some updates to our Review Program.
Let’s talk about Review Templates for Sex Toys.
We’d like to try and make the reviews even more interesting, exciting, personal, easy to write and read. We already have some ideas of our own, but I’d love to hear your outstanding thoughts, guys!
What do you want to see in a sex toy review? Maybe there are some fields you’d like to remove, as these are too difficult to describe/boring/unusef ul? And if you’d like to add something, what would that be??
The author of the best proposal will get a $50 gift card.
C’mon, share your ideas!
less
I've always felt that the extended template was redundant and a tad confusing. I always find myself writing about one feature of a toy, only to notice later that it belongs in another section (say feel texture, function, materials). I always though most of those could just be rolled into one category. Say call it "Physical properties". I'd even go so far to include functions in there. Personal comments and experience can just be one category too.
I'd limit to like 4 categories. Summary, Physical (materials/size), Experience, and maybe combine care/packaging as optional. I tend to add alternative uses for toys, since I am a guy and most reviewers are females, but that doesn't require a new category.
I could see revamping it. It has always forced you to write about all the redundant stuff like lube compatibility and safety, which probably don't concern most buyers. They want to get to the meat of the issue.
Personally, I enjoyed video reviews back in the day, but the incentive was removed. I especially liked the R rated ones, but those were censored too. It's probably unrealistic, but I'd opt for allowing X rated photos of toys in use, but I realized that might cause other issues with search/safety/fcc etc..
Perhaps increase the quantitative measures too. We have Bees/vrooms. We could add quantitative measures for material, construction/durabilit y, features, cost/value, aesthetics.
Packaging isn't super important as others have said, but worth noting sometimes. I'd leave it as optional the way it is.
As far as lingerie goes. I don't like having a minimum word count. It is counter-productive. You can't write much on a pair of stockings vs. a vibrator or even say a corset.
Back in the day, people wrote incredibly long detailed reviews, that bordered on overkill (myself included), because we were incentivized to do so. Now it doesn't matter as much. You can have tons of points and not be able to use them, since they count for only 15% of purchase. I used to enjoy doing photos and started to do videos, but then stopped after all the disruption.
I'm all for simplifying though. I think most people prefer concise reviews that emphasize user experiences that help them make an informed purchase. Plus if they are comparative to similar products.