Should Routine Circumcision of Male Infants be Illegal?

Contributor: BlackCrescent BlackCrescent
Quote:
Originally posted by Misfit Momma
Religions that require mutilating an infants penis should be abolished.
Absolutely!
08/21/2012
Contributor: BlackCrescent BlackCrescent
Quote:
Originally posted by Waterfall
I think that a parent should be able to have their infant circumsised or to decide not to do it. Either way there should be a choice.
I have to disagree. I think that it should be the childs choice since it is their body. It is not for the parent to decide because it's not the parent who has to live with the decision for the rest of their lives. Circumcision removes what will become 10-20 square inches of highly erogenous tissue. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of a penis and circumcision forever chops off many fine touch nerve endings. Studies show that men who are circumcised also tend to have smaller erections and/or tight painful erections because little to no skin is available for the penis when it expands.

We now know thanks to science that the foreskin absorbs vaginal secretions and that these secretions act on the male brain in a way that increases feelings of happiness and promotes bonding. Additionally, without the foreskin to protect the glans/head of the penis, the glans rubs up against clothing and over time develops a callous layer of cells which cover the nerves in the glans. Circumcision is essentially the dulling of the male sexual organ and it was started BY RELIGION which has long had negative and unhealthy views towards human sexuality. Remember, the bible says that if you're able to cut off you're penis you should. Fuck Holiness
08/21/2012
Contributor: Trysexual Trysexual
Other. Tough to say. It makes me sick to my stomach to watch a video of this and I'm not sure how anyone ever thought it was a good idea. On the other hand, I am circumsized and I wouldn't want to experience the procedure as an adult. I'm kinda glad I was circumsized, but it does seem barbaric.

I can't say I wish I was uncircumsized either. I find them less aesthetically appealing and of course I can't say which feels better, since I have only experienced it one way (and I cant complain).
09/13/2012
Contributor: skuttle06 skuttle06
It does hurt they DO NOT REMEMBER IT LATER NLIFE.
09/13/2012
Contributor: MJ7 MJ7
I am extremely against this. It's his choice. I could never do this to my child and I don't know how anyone could.
09/14/2012
Contributor: Zandrock Zandrock
Yes it should
09/14/2012
Contributor: Major Panda Major Panda
I think it should be taken away, just the fact your born that way.
10/01/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by skuttle06
It does hurt they DO NOT REMEMBER IT LATER NLIFE.
By that logic, is one free to do any horrible thing to a baby by the theory that "they won't remember it later in life?"

I think not.

Let the owner of the penis decide what to do to it when they are old enough to understand the risks and make the decision themselves.
10/01/2012
Contributor: Supervixen Supervixen
Quote:
Originally posted by BlackCrescent
Absolutely!
Wow...that's really upsetting for me, as a Jew, to see on here. And no one has said anything...

Yeah, people have tried to abolish us, many times. Thank God no one has completely succeeded, otherwise I wouldn't be here today.

But maybe I shouldn't throw in my two cents here, since I'm of one of those religions (and in the Jewish case, people), who should be abolished.
10/01/2012
Contributor: Supervixen Supervixen
Quote:
Originally posted by Supervixen
Wow...that's really upsetting for me, as a Jew, to see on here. And no one has said anything...

Yeah, people have tried to abolish us, many times. Thank God no one has completely succeeded, otherwise I wouldn't be here ... more
That was in response to MistfitMomma, and BlackCrescent's response to her.

Hey, I know we're all sex positive and stuff, and that's just dandy, but I would hope that there would be a little bit of outrage against antisemitism on here...even though we mutilate babies, and all, heathens that we are.
10/01/2012
Contributor: edenguy edenguy
I dunno about this one. Unless htere is a reasonable medical reason. On hte other hand, if it's somehow in the category of ear piercing...
10/02/2012
Contributor: Missmarc Missmarc
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
Yes, unless there is a medical reason
10/02/2012
Contributor: Genderfree Genderfree
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
I believe that every family should have a choice to circumcise their child, and that it would be wrong to take away their right. However, I believe that the morally right choice would be to allow the child to choose whether or not to modify his genitals, even if it is for sanitary reason. I think that, rather than it be illegal, it should become harder for parents to circumcise their child unless they have a clear and specific reason, rather it is religion or cleanliness, and not circumcise their child because it's "the thing to do".
10/03/2012
Contributor: Artishok Artishok
Yes, unless there is a medical reason
10/04/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by Supervixen
That was in response to MistfitMomma, and BlackCrescent's response to her.

Hey, I know we're all sex positive and stuff, and that's just dandy, but I would hope that there would be a little bit of outrage against antisemitism on ... more
It isn't "anti-Semitic" in any way to be opposed to circumcision.

Slavery used to be, for many people, a basic tenant of Christianity. No thinking person would say "Slavery should remain, because being against it is being Anti-Christian." Slavery was morally wrong, and when that was realized, people adapted.

I mentioned earlier in the discussion that some Jewish friends of mine have done "bloodless brises." All the ceremony and none of the cutting. Or the father's finger is pricked, or even the infant's toe is pricked.

In light of modern medical science, there is simply no medical reason to circumcise infants. Faith, like anything else, needs to be able to adapt and change, in order to survive. I say that about my own Christian faith, as much as anyone else's. For instance, I was raised Catholic, and I don't think the Catholic faith will survive if it doesn't adapt to changing conditions and problems and finally allow priests to marry and allow women priests.

Most people who are against circumcision are NOT "anti-Semites." Circumcision isn't cornered or exclusively owned by the Jewish faith, it serves a similar purpose in the Islamic faith and several others. It was around, in some form or an other long before Abraham.

We're discussing the medical fact that it doesn't help infants and in many cases harms them. I doubt it will ever be outlawed (although a lot of insurance companies are refusing to pay for it, and doctors refusing to perform them, and nurses (including myself) refusing to attend them) with good reason) but I think people need to look beyond blind adherence to Dogma and THINK and adapt and make their own choices, all faiths included.

I DO strongly disagree with anyone who says that ANY faith should be "abolished" under any circumstance. Just that ALL faiths need to learn to adapt and grow.
10/04/2012
Contributor: RonLee RonLee
Quote:
Originally posted by P'Gell
It isn't "anti-Semitic" in any way to be opposed to circumcision.

Slavery used to be, for many people, a basic tenant of Christianity. No thinking person would say "Slavery should remain, because being against it is being ... more
I agree! Indeed this has been a topic I'd discussion with a coworker who is an Orthodox Jew. We have fun with the back and forth. I've learned way more about Jewish "law" than I ever wanted to.
My response to the religious mandate that it is a sign to God... Then do it as an adult!
10/04/2012
Contributor: caseyb caseyb
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
this is a good point, never thought of it that way before.
10/04/2012
Contributor: mr115393 mr115393
As long as people still make arguments for the health benefits, and as long as there's still some religious significance to it, I don't think it'll be illegal. I wouldn't mind seeing it illegal, but it's just not likely. Still, I really think we as a culture need to stop seeing circumcision of infants as the norm. I just don't agree with permanently altering an infant's body without a medical reason.
10/08/2012
Contributor: damnbul12 damnbul12
No, parents should be allowed to circumcise their son for whatever reason
10/08/2012
Contributor: Boyfriend Boyfriend
I don't think it should be allowed
10/08/2012
Contributor: CamelliaGirl CamelliaGirl
It's hard for me to imagine how this became a thing!
12/30/2012
Contributor: RonLee RonLee
Quote:
Originally posted by CamelliaGirl
It's hard for me to imagine how this became a thing!
I wonder what ancient wacko originally did it and thought it should be done to more people? I guess I really don't want to know now that I think about it.
12/30/2012
Contributor: SelectZen SelectZen
I really don't think there is a need for them unless there is a medical issue.
12/30/2012
Contributor: LoooveMonkey LoooveMonkey
I know my boyfriend is sad that it was done to him, so yes, I think it should be illegal for infants. They can get it done when they grow up, or are at least old enough to speak for themselves.
12/30/2012
Contributor: RedKyuubi RedKyuubi
yes unless there is a medical reason.
12/30/2012
Contributor: kinksters kinksters
prefer a cut partner, but it's a decision of the parent.
12/30/2012
Contributor: snowminx snowminx
Babies can't remember anything past two weeks (and this isn't even in the newborn stage) and I've heard of men getting infections in the foreskin later in life and had to get it taken off. I'd rather a baby a few days old get it and not remember anything than a grown man having to go through all that pain.
03/15/2013
Contributor: gwenevieve gwenevieve
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
Yes. You shouldn't be able to get it until you're 18 or a legal adult. That's a very mature and personal decision.
03/16/2013
Contributor: No-jam No-jam
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
I never really learned much about this until recently, but it does seem like something that the person should be allowed to decide on their own. If they are allowed to choose their own faith, it's perfectly logical they should be allowed to choose what body parts they keep, regardless of any debates on how useful said part is(I keep reading it is very useful indeed)
03/18/2013
Contributor: bog bog
Quote:
Originally posted by bayosgirl
This is one topic I feel strongly about. I don't understand why so many babies are circumcised. Everyone is upset about FGM (female genital mutilation), and rightfully so. But how is male circumcision socially acceptable? Essentially it does the ... more
I said OTHER. I'm very against circumcision, but don't think it should be illegal. Every year, more and more people realize it's unnecessary. I'd rather push for education so people can make an informed decision, rather than push for legislation.
03/18/2013