Welcome to the Weekly Review Rumble!! Where great reviews are nominated and the community can learn about a product they may not have tried before. Below are this week's nominations. Please read each entry and choose which review(s) you like the best based on the following criteria:
- Does the reviewer hold your attention throughout the review while explaining the uses and design of the product thoroughly?
- Is the information in the review accurate? (Flared bases for anal play, condom/lube compatibility, whether a toy is porous or not, etc.)
- Does the contributor go above by explaining multiple uses and/or ways to work around potential design flaws?
Eligible Reviews for this week's nominations are: - Reviews published between 12:01 AM Monday, September 9th through 11:59 PM Sunday, September 15th.
Rules: - You may not nominate yourself
- You can make up to (3) nominations per Rumble
- The first review nominated for a user will be entered in the Rumble, additional nominations for that user will not be entered.
- The previous week’s winner is ineligible for the next round.
I don't think number 6 is supposed to be an option. I won the previous round, but was nominated before the results were clear, so I think I'm ineligible to participate in this round.
I don't think number 6 is supposed to be an option. I won the previous round, but was nominated before the results were clear, so I think I'm ineligible to participate in this round.
Okay, we'll let's let it ride for this week. There was a time where you could win multiple weeks in a row, it might be a good idea to go back to that.
Okay, we'll let's let it ride for this week. There was a time where you could win multiple weeks in a row, it might be a good idea to go back to that.
What does everyone think?
With there being less activity, I think it would be fine to let people win multiple times, especially since we now have the 1-3 placings. So that's my vote for multiples!
You can always change the rules later if you need to and anyone who is number one too often, could do what XxFallenAngelxX did, and remove themselves from competition for a while!
I don't think number 6 is supposed to be an option. I won the previous round, but was nominated before the results were clear, so I think I'm ineligible to participate in this round.
You are an honest person to point it out so fast. So I say you should still be allowed to compete this week, if for no other reason than that!
Thanks for letting me compete, Stormy! I appreciate it!
... I'll post my nomination when I find one to nominate.
I'm pretty flexible when it comes to these things, it was my mistake. And given how the activity is right now, I'd rather see more quality reviews being nominated than not regardless of who wrote them. Theoretically, a person can only vote for their own review once and now that it's multiple choice I would hope to think that if one did vote for their own work they would pick someone else to pull up with them.
I'm pretty flexible when it comes to these things, it was my mistake. And given how the activity is right now, I'd rather see more quality reviews being nominated than not regardless of who wrote them. Theoretically, a person can only vote
...
more
I'm pretty flexible when it comes to these things, it was my mistake. And given how the activity is right now, I'd rather see more quality reviews being nominated than not regardless of who wrote them. Theoretically, a person can only vote for their own review once and now that it's multiple choice I would hope to think that if one did vote for their own work they would pick someone else to pull up with them.
less
Multiple choice? I am confused; I can only vote once. Or is this a new feature for the coming rumble?
