Naughty people boxer brief
The [italic| Naughty People Briefs by Coquette] are absolutely wonderful. They add humor and sweetness to a usually boring product, men's underwear. My pair still looks new even though I bought them a month ago, and I plan to buy another pair for Christmas!
Absolutely hilarious, Great quality, Would make a funny gift
A little pricey, but worth it if it's a gift.
Published:October 22, 2012
The designer Coquette hit the mark with these! The whole line is fun and sexy at the same time. The nice thing is, you can be dirty without being super blunt about it.
Funny, fun, sexy.
Make sure he can fill it all out, or it will be saggy and that won't do!
Published:October 19, 2012
So I wish I'd seen another design, because I'd love to buy him another pair. I love the quirky design and how it flatters his sexy body. It was so worth it to buy and I'm only sad I can't find more.
Fit well, looks great, super sexy, bright colors, holds up under pressure.
Not the most comfortable pair of underwear ever, but that's not why we bought it.
Published:October 03, 2012
If you just have to have a pair of boxers with a bunch of naked people on them, then these are for you. Me, I thought they were over priced and a little cheap feeling. If you can get them for about 1/2 price, that would be more toward the price range I feel they are worth. I will give them 3 stars because they were not too bad, they just have some issues that need to be addressed.
its fun to look at
over priced, felt on the cheap side, the waist band does not feel like it will last
Published:August 11, 2012
The Naughty People boxer brief is a comfortable, small, compact pair of trunks that's surprisingly well-made. They've lasted for over a year, and don't require any special care or maintenance. They are very short and low-rise, so it's important to keep that in mind before buying, especially for those that have larger packages.
Extremely comfortable, cute and silly, frames the crotch nicely, well-made.
Doesn't hold everything in, loose in the thigh area, not substantial enough, expensive.
Published:July 28, 2012