Would you pay upwards of $40,000 for a 14-year-old video of Jennifer Lopez not having sex? We wouldn’t either, but we’re not Red Light District, YouPorn.com and PornHub.com, the web sites that TMZ says are bidding on the J.Lo not-sex tape.
Last week, a judge in Los Angeles ruled that Lopez could not stop her ex-husband Ojani Noa from releasing the couple’s honeymoon video. Lopez and Noa were married for less than a year between '97-'98.
The footage allegedly shows J.Lo "in a revealing lack of clothing, and in sexual situations,” but not actually having sex.
We’re almost sure we’ve seen Lopez like that in actual Hollywood movies, haven’t we? Maybe it’s the production values that are her real problem here … aside from her ex-husband being a low-life.
Last week, a judge in Los Angeles ruled that Lopez could not stop her ex-husband Ojani Noa from releasing the couple’s honeymoon video. Lopez and Noa were married for less than a year between '97-'98.
The footage allegedly shows J.Lo "in a revealing lack of clothing, and in sexual situations,” but not actually having sex.
We’re almost sure we’ve seen Lopez like that in actual Hollywood movies, haven’t we? Maybe it’s the production values that are her real problem here … aside from her ex-husband being a low-life.
I think any company bidding for it is just dumb - you won't be able to show it with the "child porn" paranoia in the USA. A pornographer is sitting in jail for telling an adult actress to say she was 13 in a movie! Showing a tape of a 14 yo in suggestive poses, without her consent is something that is actually harmful.