I've used a lot of prostate stimulators over the years, including several different massagers of the same general type as the Nexus Titus. Some early variety of the Aneros, purchased around 2000, must have been the first. Back then, that was the only choice. Now, there are dozens of products of essentially similar design that are intended to be used in more or less the same way. The differences between them are fairly subtle but can be important. I would suspect, however, that how much difference the differences make will depend to a large extent upon the individual user's internal anatomy: exactly how far into one's rectum one's prostate lies, how large it is, and so forth. Your mileage not only may, but certainly will, vary.
That said, the Titus is my favorite prostate toy of the non-vibrating, PC-muscle controlled type. There are days when it's my favorite prostate toy period, but there are other days I prefer the
NJoy Pure Wand or
something that
vibrates. However, I think my most intense experiences have been with the Titus. There have been times when it felt as if this thing was just reaching through my prostate, grabbing hold of some pleasure center deep within me, and just not letting go until it decided I'd had enough.
The reason, I think, is pretty simple: The shape of this toy just really seems to suit my insides. From the moment it's inserted, it puts a lot of pressure on my prostate, a lot more than the Aneros MGX, say. So much so that I once shocked myself by coming the moment I inserted it, just from that pressure. (OK, I was pretty aroused already.) I then proceeded to come several more times until the Titus thought I was done.
As far as the "clenching" method goes, that works better for me with the Titus than with any similar toy I've tried. This has something to do with the pressure, but I think it also has something to do with the more substantial character of the Titus. It's heavier than the Aneros toys by quite a bit. You might think this would allow the Aneros to move more easily, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Rather, the additional weight seems to work in the Titus's favor, transferring more force to the prostate. In any event, the "prostate" orgasms I get from the Titus are deeper, longer, and more satisfying than the ones I get from other such toys (and I was perfectly happy with the ones I got from the MGX for a very long time, thank you very much). I also find it easier to reach orgasm with the Titus, which makes it easier to play with it for longer periods of time.
As I mentioned above, the handle, being quite substantial, can be used to massage the prostate manually. Since the handle points down, and so is kind of behind me when the Titus is inserted, I find it a bit difficult to reach, but it makes for a nice change of pace from the clenching method. It's easiest if I lie on my side, though I generally prefer just to be on my back. It's nice to feel more in control of the stimulation for a bit. As I mentioned above, the handle could also be used by a partner to stimulate the user, allowing for more involvement than is typical with these things.
The handle does have a downside: It's not easy to wear the Titus under clothes, unless the clothes are very loose, because the handle sticks out too much, and it's basically impossible to sit down when the thing is inserted. This isn't likely to be an issue very often for many people, but
I do sometimes like to do this kind of thing, and I removed the handle from one of my Aneros devices so I could do so. I wouldn't recommend that here. I should also mention that there is not much variation in width with the Titus - no narrow neck for the anus to close around, which makes it slide out more easily than similar toys. I haven't had any problem with that when "clenching," but it will sometimes start to slide out when I relax after an orgasm, and it does make it less easy to use the Titus as a butt-plug. So get another (additional) toy if you want to play that way.
My only real question about the Titus concerns the ridges. Frankly, I can't feel them when it's inserted, and they don't do anything for me on the way in. If anything, they make insertion less than completely comfortable. Maybe the ridges make some kind of difference - perhaps they help stimulate peristalsis, as with the
Peridise - but I'd be interested to try a Titus without the ridges to see what the difference might be…if someone would make one. (Hint, hint.)